Calculating Initial Velocity of Object Connected to Wall by Spring

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the initial velocity of an object connected to a wall by a spring, considering factors such as mass, kinetic friction, and the spring constant. The object is flicked to initiate motion and is expected to return to its original position after oscillating.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between initial velocity, kinetic energy, and potential energy in the context of oscillatory motion. Questions arise about the role of kinetic friction and the energy lost during motion. Some participants suggest examining energy conservation principles and the effects of friction on the system.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the clarity of the original problem and exploring various interpretations. Some guidance has been offered regarding energy relationships, but there is no consensus on the correct approach or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the coefficient of kinetic friction and the spring constant as key variables. There is also mention of the assumption that the object undergoes only half a cycle of motion, which influences the analysis of energy loss and distance traveled.

plutonium
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
an object is connected to the wall through a spring and is resting at its equilibrium position. its mass is M and the coefficient of kinetic friction is 1/4. the object is flicked so that it will return to its original position (not instantly, but its oscillation is damped slowly).

what is the object's initial velocity? (you have to express it in terms of the other variables)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
plutonium said:
an object is connected to the wall through a spring and is resting at its equilibrium position. its mass is M and the coefficient of kinetic friction is 1/4. the object is flicked so that it will return to its original position (not instantly, but its oscillation is damped slowly).

what is the object's initial velocity? (you have to express it in terms of the other variables)
Your question is not clear.

I assume the object is resting on a horizontal surface and the spring is connected to the wall horizontally. The object is then given a brief impulse that causes it to move away from the wall.

If that is your question, the initial velocity does not depend on the co-efficient of kinetic friction or the spring. The answer to your question depends on the impulse.

[tex]v = F\Delta t/M[/tex]

AM
 
ok here's the exact question:

a particle of mass m rests upon a rought horizontal plane with a coefficient kinetic friction of mu = 1/4 and is connected by a light elastic string with spring constant k. if the string is just taut find the initial speed, v, that the particle needs if it is projected directly away from P such that it just returns to its initial position.

[tex]a) g\sqrt{\frac{m}{2k}}<br /> b) g\sqrt{\frac{6m}{k}}<br /> c) g\sqrt{\frac{2m}{k}}<br /> d) g\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}<br /> e) g\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}[/tex]

btw, is latex unique to this forum, or is there a program that i can download to make it work with ms word?
 
Last edited:
plutonium said:
ok here's the exact question:

a particle of mass m rests upon a rought horizontal plane with a coefficient kinetic friction of mu = 1/4 and is connected by a light elastic string with spring constant k. if the string is just taut find the initial speed, v, that the particle needs if it is projected directly away from P such that it just returns to its initial position.

[tex]a) g\sqrt{\frac{m}{2k}}<br /> b) g\sqrt{\frac{6m}{k}}<br /> c) g\sqrt{\frac{2m}{k}}<br /> d) g\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}<br /> e) g\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}[/tex]
Now it makes sense.

How much energy does it have with initial speed v0?

How much energy does it lose in traveling a distance x?

How is the potential energy at maximum extension related to the initial Kinetic energy?

I don't think any of those answers is right

AM
 
How much energy does it have with initial speed v0?
[tex]\frac{1}{2} mv^2[/tex]

How much energy does it lose in traveling a distance x?
How is the potential energy at maximum extension related to the initial Kinetic energy?
well, the kinetic energy is converted into elastic potential and work done by friction.
[tex]\frac{1}{2} mv^2 = \frac{1}{2} kx^2 + \frac{mg}{4} x[/tex]

then as it reaches its max stretch, it returns to its equilibrium point it turns into this:
[tex]\frac{1}{2} kx^2 = \frac{1}{2} mv^2 + \frac{mg}{4} x[/tex]
(x1 and x2 should be the same)

but it will then go the other way and keep repeating itself until it loses all its initial kinetic energy to friction, so i thought it would be
[tex]\frac{1}{2} mv^2 = \frac{mg}{4} x[/tex]
so wouldn't x in this case be the total distance (not displacement as it would be 0) it travels during the motion? how would i figure that out?
 
Last edited:
MASSIVE HINT: Energy is an undamped SHM system is conserved. I agree with AM, in my opinion non of the given answers are correct.

~H
 
plutonium said:
but it will then go the other way and keep repeating itself until it loses all its initial kinetic energy to friction, so i thought it would be
[tex]\frac{1}{2} mv^2 = \frac{mg}{4} x[/tex]
so wouldn't x in this case be the total distance (not displacement as it would be 0) it travels during the motion?
Correct. Since we know that it loses the rest of its energy in moving back to the equilibrium position, you can figure out the potential energy of the spring at maximum extension and from that work out the maximum extension.

Set out the equations that describe the energy of the system at maximum extension and again at 0. Then work out the solution for v.

AM
 
Last edited:
Don't I have to work out the entire motion? Or can I just calculate it by assuming it moves back to its equilibrium position after just one extention?
 
plutonium said:
... can I just calculate it by assuming it moves back to its equilibrium position after just one extention?
Isn't that the whole motion?

AM
 
  • #10
By whole motion, I meant it vibrates for a while (hence covering more distance) before coming to a stop at its starting point. Wouldn't the negative work done by friction change as the mass moves vibrate more?
 
  • #11
plutonium said:
By whole motion, I meant it vibrates for a while (hence covering more distance) before coming to a stop at its starting point. Wouldn't the negative work done by friction change as the mass moves vibrate more?
The question says it does half a cycle only. Out and back. No vibration. What does the work done by friction depend on?

AM
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
999
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K