Calculating Jupiter's Mass from Log10(a) vs Log10(P) Graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter bemc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating Jupiter's mass using the log10(a) vs log10(P) graph of its Galilean satellites. The user successfully created a graph with a trend line equation of y = 1.5012x - 8.1973 but struggled to derive Jupiter's mass from it. The correct approach involves using the rearranged Kepler's law equation m1 + m2 = (4π²a³) / (GP²), where G is the universal gravitational constant (6.67206 x 10^-11 m³/kg s²) and π is approximately 3.14. The user is advised to neglect the masses of the satellites due to Jupiter's significantly larger mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kepler's laws of planetary motion
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of gravitational constants and their applications
  • Ability to create and interpret mathematical graphs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Kepler's laws and their implications for celestial mechanics
  • Learn how to manipulate logarithmic equations for scientific calculations
  • Research the application of gravitational constants in astrophysics
  • Explore graphing techniques for analyzing celestial data
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in celestial mechanics and the calculation of planetary masses.

bemc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
my problem involves creating a graph of log10(a) vs log10(P) of the Galilean satellites and 3 others, then calculate the mass of Jupiter from the graph. P= period of the satelite, a is the semi-major axis

I have created the graph and it seems to be right since the of the trend line is 3/2. My problem is that I am unsure how to go about calculating the mass from the graph.

to get the equation y = 1.5012x - 8.1973

I have tried using m1+m2= (4*P^2*a^3)/(G*P^2)G being the universal gravitational constant 6.67206 x 10-11 m3/kg s2. I used P and A values of Io. unfortunately that produced a rather large value and doesn't utilize the graph at all.

Any help or nudges in the right direction would be greatly appreciated, Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You can neglect the masses of the satellites I think, since Jupiter is so much more massive than its satellites. Remember that the gradient is just effectivelylog_{10}(a) / log_{10}(p).
Start by rearranging the kepler equation so you can the gradient part on one side, then take the log remembering log_b(x^y) = ylog_b(x)

,
 


bemc said:
I have tried using m1+m2= (4*P^2*a^3)/(G*P^2)

You have miscopied the equation. That is not the Kepler law equation. You should have written
m1+m2= (4*PI^2*a^3)/(G*P^2)

where PI stands for the number 3.14...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K