Calculating Kinetic Energy for Rotating Planets

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the kinetic energy of a rotating planet, one must consider the rotational kinetic energy (RKE) and translational kinetic energy (TKE). The assumption of a uniform solid sphere simplifies calculations but can lead to inaccuracies, as the moment of inertia varies significantly among different celestial bodies. For example, the Earth's moment of inertia is approximately 8.034 x 10^36 kg m^2, and the average translational speed is about 29,800 m/s. While this method provides a rough estimate, it is important to note that the uniform density assumption can overstate the moment of inertia for various planets. Accurate calculations require adjustments based on the specific characteristics of each planet.
Bjarne
Messages
344
Reaction score
0
How can the kinetic energy of a rotaing planet be calculate?
I know the KE equation, - but how can I calculated the mass momentum (average speed) of the mass of a rotating body.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
mgb_phys said:
You probably have to make some assumptions that the planet is a uniform solid sphere (a bit of an overestimate for a real planet)
Alternatively, do a google search for the Earth's moment of inertia. The simplistic assumption of a uniform sphere yields a value that is off by more than 20%. In other words, while it is in the right ball park, it is not very good.
 
According to The Earth's Variable Rotation- Kurt Lambeck, the moment of inertia of the Earth around its polar axis is about

I=8.034(10^36) kg m^2

Remember
Kinetic Energy=Rotational Kinetic Energy+Translational Kinetic Energy

The TKE will vary because the translational speed of the Earth varies along its orbit. However, the average velocity is about 29,800 m/s (lenghth of orbit/365 days) so that KE=RKE+TKE=\frac{1}{2}(I\omega ^{2}+mv^{2})
plug the numbers in yourself.
 
D H said:
Alternatively, do a google search for the Earth's moment of inertia..
Nobody said anything about Earth !
 
mgb_phys said:
Nobody said anything about Earth !
Fine. Look up the moment of inertia for any planet. The uniform density assumption overstates the moment of inertia for the Sun by almost an order of magnitude, the gas giants by 60% to 100%, and the terrestrial planets by 10% (Mars) to 20% (Earth).
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top