Calculating Laplace Transform of g(t)=x(2t-5)u(2t-5)

AI Thread Summary
To find the Laplace transform of g(t) = x(2t-5)u(2t-5), the relationship between time shifting and frequency scaling is crucial. The unit step function u(2t-5) is essential as it defines the behavior of g(t) for t < 0, ensuring that x(2t-5) is only considered for t ≥ 5/2. The Laplace transform of x(t) is given as X(s) = s / (2s^2 + 1), and the transformation of g(t) can be approached by setting up the integral for L(g(t))(s) and making appropriate variable changes. Understanding that x(t)u(t) effectively zeroes out x(t) for t < 0 aids in the calculation. Overall, applying these principles will yield the correct Laplace transform for g(t).
mathrocks
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Ok, this is the question:

Assume that the Laplace transform of x(t) is given as X(s)=s / (2s^(2) + 1).
Determine the Laplace transform of the following function.

g(t)=x(2t-5)u(2t-5)

How do I use the transform they have given me to solve this...I guess my major problem lies using time shifting and frequency scaling

Or if you have g(t)=t^2 sin(3t)x(t)...do you ignore x(t) since you usually ignore u(t) when it's at the end of the function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know the laplace transform of f(t), you how does the laplace transform of f(at) look? Or that of f(t-b)u(t-b)?

You can answer these questions generally, or you could setup the integral for the laplace transform of g(t) and make a change of variable.
 
Galileo said:
If you know the laplace transform of f(t), you how does the laplace transform of f(at) look? Or that of f(t-b)u(t-b)?

You can answer these questions generally, or you could setup the integral for the laplace transform of g(t) and make a change of variable.


What happens to u(2t-5) though? Do you actually take the Laplace transform of that?
 
Last edited:
"u(2t-5)"

doesn't this refer to step functions
 
The u(2t-5) is necessary, because in the laplace transform of x(t) all information about x(t) for t<0 is lost. Since x(2t-5) is shifted to the right wrt x(t) you can't possibly know the laplace transform of x(2t-5) in terms of that of x(t). If you know x(t)=0 for t<0 then you can find the answer. That's what the unit step function does.
x(t)u(t) is just x(t) but zero for t<0. That's why you can take the lpalce transform of x(2t-5)u(2t-5) in terms of that of x(t).

If this hasn't been covered in class yet, you can just solve the problem the goold old way. Set up the integral for L(g(t))(s) and you'll see it all works out beautifully.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top