Calculating Length Along ln(x) Using Trig Substitution

  • Thread starter Thread starter danielatha4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the length of the curve defined by the function ln(x) using integral calculus and trigonometric substitution. Participants explore the setup of the integral for arc length and the subsequent steps involving differentiation and integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the integral for arc length and the use of trigonometric substitution. There are questions about specific steps in the differentiation process and the validity of certain transformations. Some participants express confusion about obtaining a negative result and seek clarification on where errors may have occurred.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the differentiation of trigonometric functions, and there is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the integral involved. Multiple interpretations of the problem and various approaches are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential limitations in evaluating the integral analytically, with suggestions to consult additional resources or instructors for further clarification. The original poster's approach and the resulting negative value are under scrutiny, indicating a need for careful examination of the steps taken.

danielatha4
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
I'm currently trying to find the length along function of ln(x) for the heck of it.

I set up this integral for length

L= int/ sqrt(1+(y')^2)

so y'=1/x

so the integral becomes

int/ sqrt(1+(1/x^2)) = int/ sqrt(x^2+1)/x

So I used trig substitution. I set
tanA=x
secA=sqrt(x^2+1)
dx = sec^2(A) dA

so the integral becomes

int/ secA/tanA * sec^2A dA= int/ sec^2A cscA dA

d/dA cscA = -cotAcscA rearrange this and get -dsecA = cscA

so the integral becomes - int/ sec^2A dsecA

set u=secA

so the integral becomes - int/ u^2 du

so -(u^3/3) evaluated from limit a to b

let the original limits be x=1 and x=5
therefore they become A=arctan1 and A=arctan5
and u=sec(arctan(1)) and u=sec(arctan(5))
where sec(arctan(1))=sqrt(2) and sec(arctan(5)=sqrt(26)

However, if you plug these limits in you get a negative answer. Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
d/dA cscA = -cotAcscA rearrange this and get -dsecA = cscA

Sorry, but this is meaningless! You need to learn better about differential forms. In reality, we have

-d\,\sec A=-\sec A\tan A \,dA.
 
d/dA cscA = -cotAcscA

so dcscA = -cotAcscA dA

d cscA/-cotA = cscA dA

cscA/cotA = secA

-dsecA = cscA dA

Which step is wrong?
 
d cscA/-cotA = cscA dA

This is step is wrong because -\cot A is not a constant with respect to A. So you cannot divide by -\cot A in the differential form.
 
Oh ok, I see that now. Thanks. I'll try a different way of solving this problem.
 
I think this integral cannot be evaluated at all except by numerical methods. Ask your teacher about it. I guess there's a theorem in Differential Algebra that can decide whether an integral may be evaluated in terms of elementary functions or not.
 
I did manage to get this far

int/ sec^2A cscA
= int/ (tan^2A + 1) cscA
= int/ tanAsecA + int/ cscA
= secA + int/ cscA

is this right?

isn't the integral of cscA equal to ln| tan x/2 | ?
 
I think you've got a point. And you can write

\int\frac{\sqrt{1+x^2}}{x}dx=\sqrt{1+x^2}-\ln\left|\frac{\sqrt{1+x^2}+1}{x}\right|

And, if I haven't done any typo,

\int_1^5\frac{\sqrt{1+x^2}}{x}dx=4.3674894278899,

which is the length you desired. Yeah, two heads do think better than one. Mission accomplished! Now, please check my results, noting also that

\int\csc A\, dA=-\ln|\csc A+\cot A|=\ln|\tan A/2|.
 
Yeah, looks right to me. Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K