Calculating ln2 with Maclaurian Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
Calculators do not typically compute ln2 using Maclaurin series; instead, they employ a variety of numerical algorithms. While some users may assume calculators use series expansions for functions like logarithms, this is not the case. The discussion highlights a misunderstanding about calculator operations and emphasizes the importance of understanding mathematical principles without relying solely on technology. A participant expresses a desire to find more information on the algorithms used by calculators. Overall, the conversation centers on the methods calculators use to compute logarithmic values.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
so when i type ln2 into my calculator does it compute ln2 using a maclaurian series?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yes, very likely. but why are you using a calculator :P
 
im not , i just want to know how the calculator comes up with the answer.
 
When you do mathematics you don't use calculators.
 
cragar, sorry for the rather silly answers you have got. No, calculator (and computers) do NOT typically use MacLaurin seiries for trig functions, exponentials, etc. I thought they did for a long time, then ran across a website that talked about a general class of numerical algorighms that are used for that. I had bookmarked the site but that was years (and a couple of computers ago) and I can't find it now. I will continue looking.
 
o thanks
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Back
Top