Calculating Magnetic Field Lines

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating magnetic field lines from an arbitrary current distribution \(\vec{J}\) using vector calculus. The magnetic field \(\vec{H}\) is governed by the equations \(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{H} = \vec{J}\) and \(\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{H} = 0\). For a source-free region, Laplace's equation allows the definition of an effective magnetic scalar potential, leading to orthogonal equipotential and field lines. However, when considering the source region, the vector potential must be utilized, complicating the calculations based on the source geometry and boundary conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus principles
  • Familiarity with magnetic field concepts and equations
  • Knowledge of Laplace's equation and scalar potentials
  • Experience with differential equations in Cartesian and spherical coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Laplace's equation in electromagnetic theory
  • Learn about vector potentials and their role in magnetic field calculations
  • Explore differential equations for field line calculations in various coordinate systems
  • Investigate the implications of boundary conditions on magnetic field distributions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students in electromagnetism who are looking to deepen their understanding of magnetic field calculations and their geometric interpretations.

thegreenlaser
Messages
524
Reaction score
16
I guess this is maybe more of a vector calculus question, but here it goes. Say I have an arbitrary current distribution \vec{J} with the corresponding magnetic field given by
\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{H} = \vec{J}
\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{H} = 0
What is the best way to calculate the field/flow lines of \vec{H} (contours to which \vec{H} is always tangent)? Do I need to calculate the magnetic field and then find the field lines from that, or is there an easier way to directly extract information about the geometry of the field lines from the equations above if I don't care about the magnitude of the magnetic field?

Edit: If it makes things easier, I'd still be interested to see the answer to this question with the added assumption that everything is uniform in the z-direction and \vec{J} only has a z component (i.e. the magnetic field is 2D: it has no z-dependence and no z-component)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want H in a source-free region (no currents or magnetization), then Laplace's equation holds and you can define an effective magnetic scalar potential that is analogous to the usual electric potential. Equipotential lines and streamlines then play the same role as in electrostatics problems: you get orthogonal potential lines and field lines. This is by far the easiest approach.

Since J has only a z component, the problem is two-dimensional problem, further simplifying it.
 
marcusl said:
If you want H in a source-free region (no currents or magnetization), then Laplace's equation holds and you can define an effective magnetic scalar potential that is analogous to the usual electric potential. Equipotential lines and streamlines then play the same role as in electrostatics problems: you get orthogonal potential lines and field lines. This is by far the easiest approach.

Since J has only a z component, the problem is two-dimensional problem, further simplifying it.

That does make sense, but unfortunately I do care about being able to do it inside the source region as well. Is there any simple technique there?
 
No, nothing simple. You typically work with the vector potential. Complexity will depend on the source geometry and boundary conditions.
 
thegreenlaser said:
I guess this is maybe more of a vector calculus question, but here it goes. Say I have an arbitrary current distribution \vec{J} with the corresponding magnetic field given by
\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{H} = \vec{J}
\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{H} = 0
What is the best way to calculate the field/flow lines of \vec{H} (contours to which \vec{H} is always tangent)? Do I need to calculate the magnetic field and then find the field lines from that, or is there an easier way to directly extract information about the geometry of the field lines from the equations above if I don't care about the magnitude of the magnetic field?

The way I know how to do this requires you to calculate the field first. Once you know \mathbf{H}(\mathbf{r})then you just construct the equations for the field lines. Let d\mathbf{r} be a differential vector parallel to the magnetic field; then we know d\mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{H} = 0. This yields differential equations for the field lines. For example, in Cartesian coordinates this yields
<br /> \frac{dx}{H_x} = \frac{dy}{H_y} =\frac{dz}{H_z}<br />
and in spherical coordinates this is
<br /> \frac{dr}{H_r} = \frac{rd\theta}{H_\theta} =\frac{r \sin\theta d\phi}{H_\phi}<br />
jason
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Fb.Researcher
Thread 'Colors in a plasma globe'
I have a common plasma globe with blue streamers and orange pads at both ends. The orange light is emitted by neon and the blue light is presumably emitted by argon and xenon. Why are the streamers blue while the pads at both ends are orange? A plasma globe's electric field is strong near the central electrode, decreasing with distance, so I would not expect the orange color at both ends.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
614
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K