Calculating Mass of Soil Scooped in 0.009 m3

  • Thread starter Thread starter ExoP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Soil
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass of soil that a scoop can hold, the volume of the scoop (0.009 m³) is multiplied by the density of the soil (1400 kg/m³). This results in a mass of 12.6 kg for the 0.009 m³ scoop. The discussion also explores how to calculate the mass for different volumes, emphasizing that the weight can be determined by scaling the density accordingly. The concept of a square scoop is clarified by comparing it to a box with defined dimensions. Overall, the calculation process is straightforward once the volume and density are established.
ExoP
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi,

I really need help with a problem. I have a plate and need to calculate how much soil it can dig.

Homework Equations





3. The Attempt at a Solution [/b
I first calculated the volume of the scoop (a square scoop) and after that I'm stuck. Anyone have an idea?

Volume of scoop: 0.009 m3 (I calculated this)
density of soil: 1400 kg/m3

How much soil can it hold?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the volume were 1 m3, how many kg of soil would go in ?
If it were 0.1 m3 ? 0.2 ? 0.01 ? 0.009 ?

How can a square scoop have a volume ?
 
Hey, you were my 1000 th p: ! Congrats!
 
That's true. Well, imagine a box with no top. It has a thickness, width, length and height.
From that, how am I going to calculate how much soil it can contain? Maybe should start with that

hehe, np
 
I still don't understand where you encounter a problem here: You have a volume and you have a weight per unit volume, so calculating the weight of this particular volume is straightforward. Right ?

If 1 m3 weighs 1400 kg, how much does 2 m3 weigh? And 0.5 m3 ? 0.1 m3 ? 0.2 ? 0.01 ? 0.009 ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top