marcusesses
- 23
- 1
I'm having some troubles with a very basic definition of the metric tensor.
The metric is defined as
ds^2 =[f(x + dx, y+dy) - f(x,y)]^2
However, I can't see how this is equal to
\frac{\partial r} {\partial x} \frac{\partial r} {\partial x}dx^2 + 2 \frac{\partial r} {\partial x} \frac{\partial r} {\partial y}dxdy + \frac{\partial r} {\partial y} \frac{\partial r} {\partial y} dy^2
I can see it in the linear case, like when
r = x+y
since
ds^2 = dx^2 + 2 dxdy + dy^2
for example. But what if there is a non-linear relation, like
f(x,y) = x^2 - y
it will produce terms like dx^4 ...(I think, anyway).
Basically, what I'm asking is how do you calculate the metric tensor components
g_{\alpha\beta}?
Are they just found by making assumptions in the curved space you are in?How do you calculate the metric tensor from the metric?
The metric is defined as
ds^2 =[f(x + dx, y+dy) - f(x,y)]^2
However, I can't see how this is equal to
\frac{\partial r} {\partial x} \frac{\partial r} {\partial x}dx^2 + 2 \frac{\partial r} {\partial x} \frac{\partial r} {\partial y}dxdy + \frac{\partial r} {\partial y} \frac{\partial r} {\partial y} dy^2
I can see it in the linear case, like when
r = x+y
since
ds^2 = dx^2 + 2 dxdy + dy^2
for example. But what if there is a non-linear relation, like
f(x,y) = x^2 - y
it will produce terms like dx^4 ...(I think, anyway).
Basically, what I'm asking is how do you calculate the metric tensor components
g_{\alpha\beta}?
Are they just found by making assumptions in the curved space you are in?How do you calculate the metric tensor from the metric?
Last edited: