Calculating Moles of Substances in 88g of Carbon Dioxide

  • Thread starter Thread starter nobahar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moles in 88g of carbon dioxide (CO2), the molecular weight is determined to be 44g/mol, resulting in 2 moles of CO2. Given the 1:2 ratio of carbon to oxygen, this translates to 2 moles of carbon and 4 moles of oxygen. The mass of carbon is calculated as 24g and oxygen as 64g, which together confirm the total mass of 88g. For percent composition, carbon accounts for approximately 27% and oxygen for about 73% of the total mass. The discussion emphasizes the importance of ensuring mass balance in calculations.
nobahar
Messages
482
Reaction score
2
Hello!
How many moles of each substance are contained in 88g of carbon dioxide?
Since it's CO2:
Ar of carbon= 12
Ar of oxgen = 16
Mr of Carbon dioxide = 44
88g/44= 2 Mol of CO2 formula units
Since the ratio is 1:2 carbon to oxygen:
(88/3)/12=22/9 Mol of Carbon
(i.e. 1/3 of 88g is how many grams carbon represents?)
and
(176/3)/16=11/3 Mol of oxygen
(i.e. 2/3 of 88g is how many grams oxygen represents)
Is this right? Any replies much appreciated! Thanks in advance!
Jay
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ar of carbon= 12
Ar of oxgen = 16
Mr of Carbon dioxide = 44
88g/44= 2 Mol of CO2 formula units
Since the ratio is 1:2 carbon to oxygen:

This part is good, but afterward I'm not quite sure how your calculations go. Here's a simpler way, I believe:

You have 2mol of CO2. This means you have 2mol C and 4mol O (each atom is multiplied by the mole amount (2).)
2mol C = 2mol(12g/mol) = 24g
4mol O = 4mol(16g/mol) = 64g
Make sure all masses add up to the total mass (88g), and that's it! It gets a bit more complicated for larger molecules (e.g. H3PO4) or with messier numbers (8.57mol rather than 2mol) but they should work the same way.

So this is the mass of each; if you wanted percent by mass (common for high school or basic college chem):
C = 24g/88g x 100 = ~27%
O = 64g/88g x 100 = ~73%
 
Last edited:
I don't know where they were going either.
Thanks for the help though!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
11K
Back
Top