MHB Calculating New Emission Rate of Radioactive Source

araz1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A radioactive source emits particles at an average rate of 1 pe second. Assume that the number of emissions follows a Poisson distribution. The emission rate changes such that the probability of 0 or 1 emission in 4 seconds becomes 0.8. What is the new rate? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
araz said:
A radioactive source emits particles at an average rate of 1 pe second. Assume that the number of emissions follows a Poisson distribution. The emission rate changes such that the probability of 0 or 1 emission in 4 seconds becomes 0.8. What is the new rate? Thanks.

Hi araz, welcome to MHB! ;)

We have:
$$P(\text{0 or 1 emission in 4 seconds})=0.8 \\ \implies
P(\text{0 emission in 4 seconds}) + P(\text{1 emission in 4 seconds}) = \frac{\lambda^0 e^{-\lambda}}{0!} + \frac{\lambda^1 e^{-\lambda}}{1!} = (1+\lambda)e^{-\lambda} = 0.8 \\ \implies
\lambda \approx 0.824
$$
So the average number of emissions in 4 seconds is $0.824$, which is $0.206$ per second.
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Hi araz, welcome to MHB! ;)

We have:
$$P(\text{0 or 1 emission in 4 seconds})=0.8 \\ \implies
P(\text{0 emission in 4 seconds}) + P(\text{1 emission in 4 seconds}) = \frac{\lambda^0 e^{-\lambda}}{0!} + \frac{\lambda^1 e^{-\lambda}}{1!} = (1+\lambda)e^{-\lambda} = 0.8 \\ \implies
\lambda \approx 0.824
$$
So the average number of emissions in 4 seconds is $0.824$, which is $0.206$ per second.

Thank you Klaas. Did you use guess and check or numerical methods to get 0.824?
Regards
 
araz said:
Thank you Klaas. Did you use guess and check or numerical methods to get 0.824?
Regards

I used an online calculator to find it.
Alternatively guessing can work, or we can look it up in a Poisson distribution table.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top