Calculating Orbital Period from Semi-Major Axis Alone

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the orbital period of an object requires knowledge of the central mass it orbits, typically provided in physics problems. The discussion emphasizes that while the problem mentions the Earth, it does not explicitly provide its mass, which is essential for calculations. Participants clarify that for introductory physics, circular orbits are usually assumed, and the term "orbital radius" often refers to the semi-major axis. They suggest that students can look up the mass of the Earth in their textbooks if needed. Overall, the consensus is that the necessary information should be accessible for solving the problem effectively.
colbenstein
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is it possible to figure out the orbital period of an object with only the orbital radius given? --- It seems to be with the equations given too little information

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the central mass about which the object is orbiting?
 
No... I am just assuming that the teacher forgot to give us the mass. I just wasn't sure if i was missing some kind of equation which would make that unnecessary. I understand that orbit is an elipse, and that what it orbits is one of the foci. is there any way to use that information without having the mass of what is being orbitted? The problem relates the central mass which it orbits (the earth), but gives us nothing about it. It's a test review question, so that's something that I wouldn't be able to look up during the actual test.
 
Last edited:
You are told that it is orbiting the Earth, so you are expected to look up the mass of the Earth; perhaps it is given in your textbook. I doubt the teacher forgot.

On a test, that information would most likely be provided for you; I've never heard of a teacher who expects you to memorize the mass of the Earth for a physics test.
 
Also, usually in introductory physics classes, only circular orbits are considered. The term "orbital radius" implies circles, as ellipses don't have a radius. You don't have to worry about elliptical orbits, foci, or anything like that.
 
Or more generally, interpret "orbital radius" to mean semi-major axis (a bit of a misnomer, but it is common). Once again you do not have to worry about eccentricity.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top