Calculating Orbital Radius for Hydrogen Atom with Given Angular Velocity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the orbital radius of a hydrogen atom based on a specified angular velocity of the electron, specifically using classical mechanics principles. Participants explore the implications of using classical versus quantum mechanics in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a calculation for the orbital radius of a hydrogen atom using classical mechanics, equating centripetal and electrostatic forces.
  • Another participant points out that classical mechanics does not accurately describe electron behavior in atoms, as quantum mechanics governs electron position and velocity.
  • A third participant questions the choice of angular velocity, suggesting that it must be correctly derived to yield the expected orbital radius.
  • Some participants acknowledge that the calculated radius corresponds to the given angular velocity but may not align with quantum mechanical predictions, including the Bohr model.
  • There is a reiteration that the assumptions made in classical mechanics lead to different outcomes compared to quantum mechanical models.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the appropriateness of using classical mechanics for this problem, with some advocating for quantum mechanical considerations. There is no consensus on the validity of the initial calculations or the implications of the chosen angular velocity.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the assumptions made regarding the electron's motion and the applicability of classical mechanics to atomic systems. The dependence on the chosen angular velocity and the constants used in calculations are also noted.

psy
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Hey guys,

The following thing got me a little bit messed up.

I want to calculate the orbital radii of an Hydrogen atom if the angular velocity of the electron is 10^16 * s^-1.

At first i set the centripetal force and the electrostatic force as equals.

( m * v^2 )/ r =k * (e^2) / r^2

v = ω * r

( m * ω^2 * r^2) / r = k * (e^2) / r^2

r ^3 = k * (e^2) / ( m * ω^2 )

r^3 = 8,99 * 10^9 Nm^2 / C * (1,60 * 10^-19 C )^2 / 9.11 10^-31 Kg * (10^16 s^-1 )^2

r^3 = (23,015 * 10^-29 Nm^2 C ) / 91,1 Kg/s^2

r =13,61 * 10^-11

While the Hydrogen radii is 0,52 * 10^-10 , I am checking it over and over again and can't find where i messed up.
Can someone tell me where i was wrong with the calculation?

Kind Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
psy said:
Can someone tell me where i was wrong with the calculation?
You are using classical mechanics, and the electron obeys the laws of quantum mechanics not classical mechanics.

In quantum mechanics the electron has no definite speed or position and does not follow a circular path around the nucleus the way the planets orbit the sun; instead we just have some probability of finding it in some spot near the nucleus if we look for it there. That ##5.2\times{10}^{-11}## radius is where that probability peaks.

(Googling for "hydrogen radius" will find many more links and the wikipedia article is not bad, but the math may quickly move past what belongs in a B-level thread).
 
Hi, I am coming to this cold but where does your initial figure for the angular velocity of the electron come from? This chosen value has to be right to get the right orbit radius.
Your starting equation looks ok (if k is given the right value) for a classical orbit. This Hyperphysics link starts in much the same way but the process is in terms of Energy. Start from a different direction, perhaps? (With QM in mind)
 
In the exercise I am doing its supposed that the electron moves in a circular orbit around the proton with the given velocity,
so I am tryng the classical mechanics with the centripetal and electrostatic force,where i can plug in the velocity of 10^16 s^-1 .

As the k I used 1/ 4*π*ε = 8,99 * 10^9 Nm/C^2 .
 
Why would you expect to get the value of the first Bohr radius? You get the radius corresponding to that velocity, in the classical mechanics framework.
It may be the right answer even it may irrelevant from the point of view of QM model. Even in the semi-classical Bohr model, there are more than one possible values for the radius of the orbit.
 
psy said:
In the exercise I am doing its supposed that the electron moves in a circular orbit around the proton with the given velocity,
so I am tryng the classical mechanics with the centripetal and electrostatic force,where i can plug in the velocity of 10^16 s^-1 .

As the k I used 1/ 4*π*ε = 8,99 * 10^9 Nm/C^2 .
So don't worry. You got an answer but it's not surprising its the Bohr radius because it makes different assumptions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
886
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K