Calculating Ozone Levels from Air Purifier Output: Converting mg/hr to ppb

  • Thread starter Thread starter greengirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ozone
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the ozone output from an air purifier that produces 360 mg/hr in a 2500 square foot space with 10-foot ceilings. Using approximations, it is estimated that this output could lead to a concentration of about 270 ppb of ozone after one hour, which exceeds the safety threshold of 50 ppb. The conversation highlights concerns about ozone-producing air purifiers, noting that they can replace one pollutant with another. Additionally, it is mentioned that ozone naturally dissipates, suggesting that prolonged use would result in lower concentrations over time. The discussion underscores the importance of understanding the implications of ozone levels in indoor air quality.
greengirl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Editor Note: Moved from a technical forum and therefore no template.

Hi! I'm terrible at this sort of thing so came to this forum for help. I'm trying to figure out how much ozone an air purifier will throw into my indoor air. The unit produces 360 mg/hr. My space is 2500 square feet. Ceilings are 10 feet high.

The threshold for ozone safety is 50 ppb.

Can anyone help me figure out how long I can run the unit before I reach the 50 ppb threshold?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ppb is parts per billion, right?
I can walk through the process, but I cannot vouch for how accurate the approximations are.

According to Wikipedia, air at 20 degrees Celsius is about 1.2 kg per m^3.
And molar mass of dry air is 0.0289644 kg/mol. This means that
## \frac{1.2}{0.0289644} ## should approximate the number of molecules (in moles) in a cubic meter.
Using the rough conversion of 3m ##\approx## 10ft, your space is about 15mx15mx3m ##\approx## 675 cubic meters.
As a rough estimate, I would use
## 675 \frac{1.2}{0.0289644} = 27965 \approx 28000 ##
moles of air particles in your home.
Remember that there may already be some ozone in your air.

Next, we will convert 360mg/hour into particles per hour.
Ozone is O_3, which has molar mass of 16*3 = 48g/mol. If you are outputting 360 mg per hour, then that is
## \frac{360 mg }{48000mg} = .0075## moles per hour.

dividing the moles of ozone by the moles of air, you get
## \frac{7.5 x 10^{-3} }{ 2.8 x 10^4 } = 2.7 x 10^{-7}##
Converting to parts per billion, you want the exponent to be -9, so multiply by 100 to get about 270 ppb.

Lastly, you should consider how much ozone will dissipate and/or convert by natural processes back to oxygen. This rate of change will work against the buildup of ozone in your home.

Finally, as I was looking for additional conversions, I found a link to California's recent action on ozone-producing air purifiers. It looks like there is good information at their web page
https://www.arb.ca.gov/research/indoor/aircleaners/consumers.htm
 
  • Like
Likes billy_joule
Wow! I'm glad I came here for help. Thank you RUber!

So, it would produce 270 ppb in an hour?
 
That's what I get based on the conversions and approximations I used.
It seems high, but I think that is why recently many consumer groups have advocated against ozone-producing air purifiers -- because they replace one type of pollutant with another.
Ozone does naturally dissipate, so if you use it continuously for 100 hours, you would have significantly less than 27000ppb in your home.
That is the extent of my knowledge on the matter, though. I am simply a mathematician, not an environmental (air quality) scientist.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top