A Calculating Particle Lifetimes to Unstable Particle Decay

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter HeavyWater
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lifetime Particle
HeavyWater
Messages
55
Reaction score
4
The lifetime of Tritium is about 13 years. The lifetime of positronium is about one-tenth of a nanosecond. Can you point me to some papers or tell me how to calculate the lifetime of an unstable particle? For example, suppose I want to calculate the lifetime of the pion? Or muonium? Etc.
 
  • Like
Likes NikolaTesla2
Physics news on Phys.org
Identify possible decay modes (at least the most common ones). Approximate their amplitudes, then integrate over the available phase space for the decay. For the muon or Z boson you can get a good approximation on one page, for more complicated systems you are looking at much more work.

Muonium is (unlike the name would suggest) a bound state between an electron and an antimuon. It "decays" via the antimuon decaying, so it has nearly the same lifetime as a free muon.
A bound state between a muon and an antimuon would be called "true muonium" and hasn't been observed yet.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Thank you mfb. I did not expect such a quick response. I am intrigued by the decay of positronium in the singlet spin state. Each of the constituents is a stable particle; yet this composite state decays into two gammas. We have an EM interaction between a particle and its anti particle--this would seem like a sure bet for a stable composite system. (Now, it didn't occur to me until today, that the positron should be treated as a Dirac anti particle). What do you think is causing this system to decay: a lack of enough binding energy? A surface tension type effect? No rush needed on your response.
 
  • Like
Likes YoungPhysicist
HeavyWater said:
What do you think is causing this system to decay
A possible decay mode. Simple particle/antiparticle annihilation. I'm sure there are publications calculating the lifetime.
 
  • Like
Likes YoungPhysicist
Thank you to everyone for your helpful comments. The calculation of the lifetime of positronium is described on p227 of JJ Sakurai's book on Advanced Quantum Mechanics. I didn't think that the volume per unit time of positron decays could be inverted to give the lifetime of a unit volume of positronium. I also didn't think about Fermi's Golden Rules.

I had a lot of fun thinking about positronium--I thought that this might be an application of Chaos Theory. Thanks to everyone for your encouragement.
 
  • Like
Likes YoungPhysicist
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
6K
Back
Top