Calculating Post-Collision Speeds of Billiard Balls

  • Thread starter Thread starter pupatel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls Collison
AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about a perfectly elastic head-on collision between two billiard balls of equal mass, the initial speeds are given as 2.00 m/s and 3.00 m/s in opposite directions. The key conclusion is that after the collision, the balls will exchange their speeds: the first ball will move at -3.00 m/s and the second at 2.00 m/s. Participants referenced the conservation of momentum and energy equations to derive this outcome, confirming that the final speeds can be derived through algebraic manipulation of these principles. Despite initial confusion, the consensus is that the balls simply swap their velocities due to the nature of elastic collisions.
pupatel
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
:confused:

I was wondering if someone can help me with this problem:

Two biilard balls of equal mass undergo a perfectly elastic head-on collison. If the speed of one ball was initially 2.00 m/s and of the other 3.00 m/s in the opposite direction, what will be their speeds after the collision??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See this:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/colsta.html#c2
In short - the speed of the first ball would be 3 m/s and the speed of the second ball would be 2 m/s.

Conservation of momentum:
m_1v_1 + m_2v_2 = m_1u_1 + m_2u_2

m_1 = m_2

v_1 + v_2 = u_1 + u_2

(v_1 + v_2)^2 = (u_1 + u_2)^2

v_1^2 + 2v_1v_2 + v_2^2 = u_1^2 + 2u_1u_2 + u_2^2

Conservation of energy:
\frac{1}{2}m_1v_1^2 + \frac{1}{2}m_2v_2^2 = \frac{1}{2}m_1u_1^2 + \frac{1}{2}m_2u_2^2

m_1 = m_2

v_1^2 + v_2^2 = u_1^2 + u_2^2

So we have:
v_1^2 + 2v_1v_2 + v_2^2 = u_1^2 + 2u_1u_2 + u_2^2

v_1^2 + v_2^2 = u_1^2 + u_2^2

Substract them:
2v_1v_2 = 2u_1u_2

u_1 = \frac{v_1v_2}{u_2} = v_1 + v_2 - u_2

u_1 = v_1v_2 = v_1u_2 + v_2u_2 - u_2^2

u_2^2 - (v_1 + v_2)u_2 + v_1v_2 = 0

A quick inspection would reveal that the solutions to that are v1 and v2. v2 is the speed before collision, so we are left with v1. Hence u1 = v2 and u2 = v1. There are probably much easier ways to come to this but it's late. :zzz:
 
Last edited:
I am still confused...I use these equations but it doesn't give me the right answer...
 
pupatel said:
:confused:

I was wondering if someone can help me with this problem:

Two biilard balls of equal mass undergo a perfectly elastic head-on collison. If the speed of one ball was initially 2.00 m/s and of the other 3.00 m/s in the opposite direction, what will be their speeds after the collision??
They will interchange speeds. Ball 1 was at 2m/s, after collision is -3m/s. Ball 2 was at -3m/s, after collision is 2m/s.

Edit: I notice Chen already gave this answer. Here's another derivation:
v_1+v_2=u_1+u_2\mbox{ and }v_1^2+v_2^2=u_1^2+u_2^2
Move them around a bit:
v_1-u_1=u_2-v_2\mbox{ and }v_1^2-u_1^2=u_2^2-v_2^2
Divide these last two equations and get:
v_1+u_1=v_2+u_2
Subtract this from the first equation and also add it to the first equation, get:
v_2=u_1\mbox{ and }v_1=u_2
 
Last edited:
I knew there was an easier way to get to that. :-p
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top