Calculating Potential in a Conducting Sphere and Wire Configuration

  • Thread starter Thread starter kyryk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential in a system with a conducting sphere and a radially positioned conducting wire. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their solution to the problem, which involves a sphere of radius R at potential V and a wire extending from R1 to R2, both greater than R. Other participants suggest that the question resembles a homework problem and encourage the poster to share their attempted solution for critique. There is speculation about the wire potentially introducing a singularity that complicates the solution, indicating that standard methods may not apply. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in solving this unique electrostatics problem.
kyryk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am trying to solve the following problem:

Consider the configuration of a conducting sphere of radius R held at potential V, and a conducting wire radially positioned with respect to the sphere with one end at R1>R, and the other end at R2>R1. What is the potential everywhere?

I chalked down a quick solution but I don't believe my answer. Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kyryk said:
I am trying to solve the following problem:

Consider the configuration of a conducting sphere of radius R held at potential V, and a conducting wire radially positioned with respect to the sphere with one end at R1>R, and the other end at R2>R1. What is the potential everywhere?

I chalked down a quick solution but I don't believe my answer. Any help would be appreciated!

This certainly seems like a homework-type question (even if it is not actual homework), so I think you should get a mod to move it to the homework subforums and post your attempt at a solution.
 
Not a homework question. As a matter of fact, never seen such type of E&M questions in standard books. I suspect that the wire presents some sort of singularity in the solution that is a bit tricky to handle, at least I can't see a standard solution applying here. However, if I'm wrong and there is a trivial solution, even better if this is indeed a homework question somewhere, I'd like a link or something of the sort.
 
kyryk said:
Not a homework question. As a matter of fact, never seen such type of E&M questions in standard books. I suspect that the wire presents some sort of singularity in the solution that is a bit tricky to handle, at least I can't see a standard solution applying here. However, if I'm wrong and there is a trivial solution, even better if this is indeed a homework question somewhere, I'd like a link or something of the sort.

Still seems like a homework-type question to me. In any case, you said in your first post that you "chalked down a quick solution" but aren't confident in your answer - why not post that solution (or the main points of it) so we can critique it?
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top