Calculating Power & Temperature Loss from Cable

AI Thread Summary
Calculating power and temperature loss from a cable involves using the formula P = VI, where P is power, V is voltage, and I is current. The heat generated in the cable leads to a temperature rise until it reaches equilibrium with the environment. There are no straightforward equations for determining the exact temperature rise, and experimental methods or simulations are recommended for accurate results. For basic calculations, the approach discussed can provide average temperature estimates, but peak temperatures require more complex analysis. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding thermal resistance and the surrounding conditions for accurate assessments.
HelpFinch
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I am trying to calculate the power and temperature lost from a cable. So I can do some crude thermodynamic calculations on heat transfer.

I am assuming in this case that the object next to the cable is touching, and I am trying to calculate how much power and temperature is transferred from the cable to the neighbouring material.

I have presently been calculating it with the Power = VI and the temperature loss is equal to I^2 x R.

I am not that great at the electronics but I think I am actually calculating just the power in the cable and I am being stupid in assuming this is the actual power transmitted to the surroundings I would just like some clarrification or correction if I am misleading myself.

Thanks for any help in advance,
Finch
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
HelpFinch said:
Hi guys,

I am trying to calculate the power and temperature lost from a cable. So I can do some crude thermodynamic calculations on heat transfer.

I am assuming in this case that the object next to the cable is touching, and I am trying to calculate how much power and temperature is transferred from the cable to the neighbouring material.

I have presently been calculating it with the Power = VI and the temperature loss is equal to I^2 x R.

I am not that great at the electronics but I think I am actually calculating just the power in the cable and I am being stupid in assuming this is the actual power transmitted to the surroundings I would just like some clarrification or correction if I am misleading myself.

Thanks for any help in advance,
Finch

Welcome to the PF.

The power converted to heat in the cable is P = VI = V^2/R = I^2 R

Where V is the end-to-end voltage drop across the cable, R is the resistance of the cable, and I is the current flowing through the cable. This power goes into heating the cable materials. That heat will cause a temperature rise in the cable, until it reaches some equilibrium with the excess heat flowing out into the enviroment.

AFAIK, there are no simple equations for calculating what temperature the cable rises to, given the external environment's characteristics. You can determine it experimentally, or you can use simulation software to calculate what it will probably be.

Do you have a particular application in mind? What kind of cable are you thinking of? Is the power transmission down the cable at DC or 50/60Hz AC, or some other frequency?
 
Thanks for answering Berkeman I appreciate it.

I intend on using transmforming the UK AC current and use a transformer to reduce the standard to a low voltage input most likely below 40. I believe in the UK it is 220V and 50Hz.

The desired output here is the temperature and the purpose is to find a material that gives out high temperature while being low cost (a balance will obviously met).


I only need to do some crude calculations to prove concepts so that experimental data can be made. Thus I hope I do not have to go through long differential equations in order to find accurate data!

Thanks and Regards,
Finch
 
If all you need is an average temp of the wire this technique will work.

This will not find the peak temp in the wire. For that you need differential equations and information you can probably only get experimentally so you might as well just run the experiment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conductivity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_resistance_in_electronics

The trick is how you define the thermal resistance of the wire's insulation, assuming it has some, and the connection to ambient. Probably somebody already solved it for the geometry of a wire and some standard materials, with the assumption that the wire is suspended in air. I wouldn't be surprised to find out it was a typical physics homework question or something. Try googling with the keywords in the wikipedia article.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top