Losses on Power Transmission Lines

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating power losses in transmission lines, specifically focusing on a scenario where a power station transmits energy over a distance of 15 km. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of determining average power loss per kilometer, considering various factors such as resistance, load conditions, and unit conversions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially presents a calculation for average power loss, suggesting it to be 7.2 MWh per km based on energy transmitted and received.
  • Another participant questions the accuracy of the initial numbers, pointing out inconsistencies in the calculations and emphasizing the importance of using correct units (MWh vs. MW).
  • Some participants express uncertainty about calculating power loss without knowing exact load conditions, suggesting that assumptions may need to be made.
  • One participant proposes an approximate calculation method using the formula Power = I² x R, highlighting the need to convert resistance from ohms per Mft to ohms per km.
  • Discussion includes the concept of power factor and its impact on calculations, with one participant explaining that inductive loads can affect the actual power calculation.
  • A later post corrects the resistance value for the ACSR Flamingo cable and provides specific calculations for power losses under different load conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of calculating power loss without knowing load conditions, and there is no consensus on the best approach to take. Some participants agree on the importance of unit consistency and the role of power factor, while others remain uncertain about the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific load conditions and assumptions made regarding power factor, which could affect the accuracy of the calculations. The discussion also highlights potential errors in unit conversions and logical reasoning.

Barry Fends
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Say a power station transmits 1008 MWh of power per year to a facility however they only receive 900 MWh say the transmission line is 15 km long how would you calculate average power loss per km, now I know that theoretically it will just be 7.2 MWh per km but what calculations would you make to get there?
Additional Info:
Cable Type: FLAMINGO (ACSR)
Voltage:132kV
Cable Diameter:25mm
Resistance: 0.315 Ohms per MFT
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Barry Fends said:
ay a power station transmits 10008 MW of power per year to a facility however they only receive 900 MW say the transmission line is 15 km long how would you calculate average power loss per km, now I know that theoretically it will just be 7.2 MW per km but what calculations would you make to get there?

A couple of things:

1. Are you sure your numbers are correct? 10008 - 900 = 9108, but 15km * 7.2 MW/km = 108 MW, and the two results don't add up to the total.

2. I'm assuming you mean MWh and not MW. Watt-hours are units of energy, but watts are units of power. Electric power usage is usually a measure of energy usage, not power, despite everyone using electric "power". So using some amount of MWh over the course of a year makes sense and you can convert that into Joules, the SI unit of energy. However, saying that you used some amount of MW over the course of a year makes no sense because a megawatt is already energy/time and dividing it by time again makes it meaningless.
 
I ap
Drakkith said:
A couple of things:

1. Are you sure your numbers are correct? 10008 - 900 = 9108, but 15km * 7.2 MW/km = 108 MW, and the two results don't add up to the total.

2. I'm assuming you mean MWh and not MW. Watt-hours are units of energy, but watts are units of power. Electric power usage is usually a measure of energy usage, not power, despite everyone using electric "power". So using some amount of MWh over the course of a year makes sense and you can convert that into Joules, the SI unit of energy. However, saying that you used some amount of MW over the course of a year makes no sense because a megawatt is already energy/time and dividing it by time again makes it meaningless.
I apologise I have edited the post to make more sense it was 1008 not 10008 and the units were mixed up
 
Last edited:
Well, I'm not sure I can help you. I'm not even sure there is a way to calculate the power loss in the conductor without knowing the exact load conditions. But perhaps someone else here knows better than I.
 
Drakkith said:
Well, I'm not sure I can help you. I'm not even sure there is a way to calculate the power loss in the conductor without knowing the exact load conditions. But perhaps someone else here knows better than I.
I think it is just assumed there is no load conditions.
 
This seems to me an exercise designed to:
make you keep units straight,
make you attack the problem in small logical steps
drive home the difference between power and energy.
I rather like it as a teaching tool..

so you want to check the measured MWH numbers?
You don't have enough information for an exact calculation
but you can make an approximate one as follows

Power = I2 x R

you can find resistance R per conductor, that's just changing from ohms per Mft to ohms per KM
and you can find approximate current I from power and voltage leaving the station, but you'll have to either neglect or guess at the power factor just use 1.0 for first approximation
I2R gives you watts which you'll have to convert to Mwh/year.

How does the resulting I2R loss compare with your 7.2 MWH/Km over a year ?
I call such approximate comparison Sanity Checks" . They're quite useful for finding errors of logic, incorrect unit conversion or mis-keyed calculator entries.
 
jim hardy said:
This seems to me an exercise designed to:
make you keep units straight,
make you attack the problem in small logical steps
drive home the difference between power and energy.
I rather like it as a teaching tool..

so you want to check the measured MWH numbers?
You don't have enough information for an exact calculation
but you can make an approximate one as follows

Power = I2 x R

you can find resistance R per conductor, that's just changing from ohms per Mft to ohms per KM
and you can find approximate current I from power and voltage leaving the station, but you'll have to either neglect or guess at the power factor just use 1.0 for first approximation
I2R gives you watts which you'll have to convert to Mwh/year.

How does the resulting I2R loss compare with your 7.2 MWH/Km over a year ?
I call such approximate comparison Sanity Checks" . They're quite useful for finding errors of logic, incorrect unit conversion or mis-keyed calculator entries.
Thanks for the reply what do you mean by power factor?
 
Barry Fends said:
what do you mean by power factor?
Inductive loads like transformers and motors cause a teeny extra bit of current to flow,
so that power isn't quite Volts X Amps it's Volts X Amps X Power Factor.
Power factor is can only be 1.0 or less. A factory will get charged for power factor less than 1.0 so they try to keep it real close to 1.0.

So the "approximate calculation" i described will be in error by the power factor's difference from 1.0. Assuming power factor is not less than 0.95, that's just a few per cent.

Did teacher give any clue as to that factory's power factor?
 
jim hardy said:
Inductive loads like transformers and motors cause a teeny extra bit of current to flow,
so that power isn't quite Volts X Amps it's Volts X Amps X Power Factor.
Power factor is can only be 1.0 or less. A factory will get charged for power factor less than 1.0 so they try to keep it real close to 1.0.

So the "approximate calculation" i described will be in error by the power factor's difference from 1.0. Assuming power factor is not less than 0.95, that's just a few per cent.

Did teacher give any clue as to that factory's power factor?
None at all
 
  • #10
Barry Fends said:
None at all
I'd use 1.0 then.
 
  • #11
Correction: ACSR Flamingo AC resistance 75oC it is only 0.0314 ohm/1000 ft.=0.103 ohm/km

If we shall take 365 days/year 24 h the losses will be 12.3 kW that means 51.5 A/phase.

(1008-900)*1000/365/24=12.32 kW

[Ploss=3*0.103*15*51.5^2=12.29 kW].

If we shall take full only 8 h/day the losses will be 37 kW that means 89.3 A/phase

It is a very low load for this 132 kV transmission line [the rated is about 800 A].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K