Calculating Probability with Infinite Product: 0.28

  • Thread starter Thread starter learnfrench
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Product
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability related to an infinite product, specifically \prod_{j=1}^{\infty}\frac{2^{j}-1}{2^{j}}, which approximates to 0.28. This product is linked to the probability of a binary matrix being nonsingular. The constant derived from this infinite product is referred to as Q, particularly in the context of digital tree searching. Additional resources are provided for further exploration of infinite products and tree searching concepts. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of finding a definitive formula for this probability calculation.
learnfrench
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am actually trying to calculate a probability and hitting upon the infinite product:

\prod_{j=1}^{\infty}\frac{2^{j}-1}{2^{j}}

Any idea what this might be (it's about 0.28, but I want the formula).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
learnfrench said:
I am actually trying to calculate a probability

that a binary matrix is nonsingular?

http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A048651 is the constant. There are several formulas there, but probably none that are 'the formula' you hoped to find.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top