Calculating Pump Power for Steady Water Flow: Work-Energy Theorem Approach

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the power of a pump used to move water at a steady flow rate of 5.0 m/s through a hose with a radius of 1.0 cm, lifting it 3.0 m above the waterline. The established power output of the pump is 66 Watts, derived using the work-energy theorem, which incorporates both gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Participants emphasize the importance of considering the varying heights of water parcels within the hose and the need to calculate the work done on each parcel to arrive at the total power required for the pump.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the work-energy theorem
  • Familiarity with fluid dynamics concepts, specifically volume and mass flow rates
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy calculations
  • Basic calculus for integrating work done over varying heights
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about fluid dynamics and the Bernoulli equation
  • Study the principles of mass flow rate calculations in fluid systems
  • Explore the derivation and application of the work-energy theorem in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the effects of varying hose diameters on pump power requirements
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, engineers working with fluid systems, and anyone involved in pump design or optimization will benefit from this discussion.

Addem
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Water is pumped steadily out of a flooded basement at
5.0 m/s through a hose of radius 1.0 cm, passing through a window
3.0 m above the waterline.What is the pump’s power?

Homework Equations



Volume and mass flow rates are constant

R_v = Av; \quad M_v = \rho A v

Work-energy Theorem

W = \Delta E = \Delta U + \Delta K

The Attempt at a Solution



I've seen one solution leading up to the same answer as in the back of the book, 66 Watts. It goes by imagining a small chunk of water of mass Δm and the work done on it by the pump of a time Δt. Several attempts at that method can be found here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/power-of-a-pump.551946/

However, this seems odd to me. I would think that the water in the hose from the start should be handled differently from the water in the basement that is not (yet) in the hose. The water at the very top of the hose doesn't need to go anywhere, and the water only a little bit below it only needs to go a small distance and then it vanishes. The water at the bottom of the hose needs to be lifted a distance of 3m. The water not yet in the hose just sits there until space is made for it and then only makes it up the hose a certain distance.

My thought about this was to think of, again, a small chunk of water and the work done on it, but to split the two cases where it's in the hose and where it isn't yet. To model the work done on the water I reason that, in time Δt at a height h from the water level, the work done on the water is \rho \pi r^2 g(3-h)\Delta h as this accounts for the linear variation of the amount of height that the water in the hose has to travel. This would then lead to the integral \int_0^3 \rho \pi (0.01^2) g (3-h)dh

Then you'd have to do something similar for the water that began not in the hose and add the two calculations of work together.

Is this a good argument?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How much work does it take to raise a mass of 1 kg a vertical distance of 3 meters?

How much work does it take to accelerate a mass of 1 kg from a velocity of 0 m/s to a velocity of 5 m/s?

What is the mass flow rate through the hose?
 
The work to raise 1 kg a vertical distance of 3 m is 9.8*3 N, but my point is that not every quantity of water must be raised 3 m, unless we assume the hose begins empty and ends empty and runs for unit time I suppose.

I may not be appreciating what you're getting at.
 
Addem said:
The work to raise 1 kg a vertical distance of 3 m is 9.8*3 N, but my point is that not every quantity of water must be raised 3 m, unless we assume the hose begins empty and ends empty and runs for unit time I suppose.

I may not be appreciating what you're getting at.
You can ignore the startup and shutdown entirely. Instead, concentrate on the steady state. In this steady state there are many small parcels of water in various stages of their journey simultaneously. We can focus on any parcel. It will be representative of all of the rest.

How much energy does it take per parcel? How many parcels pass a particular point every second?

You have calculated the work to raise 1 kg of water 3 meters as 9.8*3 N. You should re-check the units for that result. Then you can proceed with the rest of the calculation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
914
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K