Calculating Quantum Tunneling Probability - 1.524 eV, 343 pm, 2.654 eV

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the transmission probability of an electron with an energy of 1.524 eV through a barrier of 343 pm and a potential height of 2.654 eV. It emphasizes that the potential energy before and after the barrier is not crucial as long as it remains below 1.524 eV, allowing for a traveling wave. The user has successfully calculated the decay constant, kappa, using the formula K = √{[2m(E-V0)] / (h-bar^2)}. The final transmission probability can be determined using the expression exp(-2 * kappa * barrier thickness). This approach highlights the importance of barrier thickness in quantum tunneling calculations.
alexis12
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the approximate transmission probability (in %) of an electron with total energy 1.524 eV through a barrier of thickness 343 pm, and a potential height of 2.654 eV? (Does it matter what the potential energy is before and after the barrier? Not really, as long as it is <1.524 eV, so in both cases there is a traveling wave.)

Homework Equations


None given however I believe it has something to do with: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_coefficient

I've managed the previous question which was about probability of transmission however it didn't deal with barrier thickness which I am not accustomed to. I can't find any literature on the subject other than the Wikipedia article I linked.

The Attempt at a Solution


No real attempt, I managed to calculate Kappa which is
K = Square root of {[2m(E-V0)] / (h-bar^2)}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Figured it out! It's exp(-2 *kappa *barrier thickness)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top