Calculating Rotational Speed Change When Adding Mass to a Rotating Object"

  • Thread starter Thread starter rdmachinist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Rotating
AI Thread Summary
When a 40 lb. rotating mass has a 1 lb. mass added to its central axis, the rotational speed will decrease, but the extent of this slowdown depends on the shapes and distribution of the masses. The moment of inertia plays a crucial role in determining how much the larger mass slows down, as it varies based on the geometry of the objects involved. The discussion raises questions about the relationship between rotational speed and the proportionality of the slowdown, suggesting that this may not follow a simple inverse square law. Understanding angular momentum is essential for accurately calculating these changes. The complexity of the scenario highlights the need for more specific information about the masses' shapes to provide a precise answer.
rdmachinist
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If a rotating 40 lb. mass has a non rotating 1 lb. mass instantly added to it's central axis, how much will the rotating mass slow down? Secondly, all else equal, does the rotational speed change the proportionality with which the smaller mass slows the larger (inverse square or some such law)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rdmachinist said:
If a rotating 40 lb. mass has a non rotating 1 lb. mass instantly added to it's central axis, how much will the rotating mass slow down? Secondly, all else equal, does the rotational speed change the proportionality with which the smaller mass slows the larger (inverse square or some such law)?
There's not enough information to answer the question: it depends on the shapes of the masses. Assuming a vertical axis:
  • If the large mass was tall and thin, and the small mass was short and fat, the large mass would slow down a lot.
  • If the large mass was short and fat, and the small mass was tall and thin, the large mass wouldn't slow very much.
Do you know about angular momentum? Or moment of inertia?
 
I'll look into these terms more thoroughly and repost at a later date if nessesary. Thanks for the reply.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top