Calculating Rotations for a Space Station

AI Thread Summary
To achieve an acceleration similar to Earth's gravity, a space station with a diameter of 125m requires a rotation period of approximately 15.87 seconds per revolution. This results in the station completing about 5444 rotations in one day. The calculations for velocity and rotation period were verified as correct, with a recommendation to maintain three significant figures in the final answers. The acceleration due to gravity used in the calculations was noted to have only two significant figures, which could affect the precision of the results. Overall, the methodology and numerical results were deemed appropriate for the problem.
dani123
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



One design for orbiting space stations has a structure that is very much like a large bicycle wheel. The astronauts live on the inside of this wheel where the spinning provides an acceleration similar to Earth's gravity. Suppose the space station has a diameter of 125m .

a) What period of rotation would be required for the astronauts to experience an acceleration similar to the acceleration of gravity on Earth?

b) How many rotations would this space station have to make in one day?

Homework Equations



ac=v2/r

v=2∏r/T

The Attempt at a Solution



A) we know that d=125m so r=62.5m and a=9.8m/s2 T=?

So I started by finding V with ac=v2/r equation and found that v=24.7487m/s

I then plugged that number into T=2∏R/v=15.87s per revolution.

B) For this part of the question I first had to break down how many seconds were in a day and found 1 day=86400seconds

Then I did, Δt/T=86400s/15.87s=5444 rotations in a day

So I would like for someone to look over my work and verify that I did it correctly and that my answers are good, and also if you could check that my significant figures are being respected! This would be very appreciated, thank you so much for your help and time! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Your method is fine and the numbers are good. As for significant figures, the only given value in the problem (the diameter at 125m) has three significant figures. That implies that you should display answers with the same number of significant figures (but retain more figures for intermediate results when you carry them forward into more calculations!)

Note that if you want to retain the level of precision then any values you introduce should have the same or greater precision. The acceleration due to gravity that you introduced has only 2 figures. Of course the problem statement says that you're looking for "an acceleration similar to Earth's gravity", which by strict interpretation might be anything of the same order of magnitude! Bit of a judgement call there. I think simply rounding your current answers to three figures will be acceptable.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top