Calculating Shear Strain in 3 Dimensions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating shear strain in three dimensions, specifically addressing the relationship between shear strain components along the x and y axes. Participants clarify that shear strain can be defined as the angular change (α) or as the ratio of the change in length (Δx) to the orthogonal length (y). For small angles, the approximation holds that α is equivalent to both tan(α) and sin(α). The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these relationships for accurate strain calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of shear strain and its definitions
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, particularly tangent and sine
  • Basic knowledge of dimensional analysis in mechanics
  • Concept of small angle approximations in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of shear strain formulas in three dimensions
  • Study the application of small angle approximations in engineering
  • Explore the differences between shear strain and normal strain
  • Learn about the implications of using tan versus sin in strain calculations
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, civil engineers, and students studying material mechanics who need to understand the calculations and implications of shear strain in three-dimensional contexts.

v_pino
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
http://folk.ntnu.no/stoylen/strainrate/mathemathics/

This page shows how to find shear strain in three dimensions.

I understand how they found the shear strains as x and y components from dividing the change in length by the original length.

But from the line "From the figure, it is also evident that..." I cannot understand how they combined the strains from the x and y axes to find the functions of tan.

Also, how after I have found the functions of tan, how do I use approximation of small angles to find that the strains actually simply equals the angle itself? I have seen some other websites using sin instead of tan.

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The tangent is the rise over the run: from the figure, \frac{\Delta x}{y}.

For small angles, \alpha\simeq\tan \alpha\simeq\sin\alpha. Is this where you got stuck, or is it in the derivation of this expression?
 
I thought strain should be the change in length over original length. So shouldn't the strain along the x-axis be Delta-x over X instead of Delta-x over Y?
 
As discussed right under that image, the normal strain is the change in length divided by the original length. The shear strain can be defined as either the angular change of an originally right angle (i.e., \alpha) or as the change in length divided by the orthogonal length (i.e., \frac{\Delta x}{y}). For small angles, it's the same thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K