Calculating Slit Width for Diffraction Pattern

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the slit width for a diffraction pattern created by monochromatic light with a wavelength of 500 nm. Given the distance from the slit to the screen is 140 cm and the distance from the central maximum to the first order maximum is 3 mm, the angle for the first order maximum is determined to be approximately 0.0214 radians. Using the formula d = (m * λ)/sin(θ), the slit width is calculated to be about 0.0233 mm. This narrow width is essential for achieving a clear diffraction pattern with distinct maxima and minima.
Jacob87411
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
A diffraction pattern is produced on a screen 140 cm from a single slit using monochromatic light of wavelength 500 nm. The distance from the center of the central maximum to the first order maximum is 3 mm. Calculate the slit width (assume first order maximum is halfway between the first and second order minima).

So things we know-
From the slit to the screen is 140 cm
Wavelength = 500 nm
from the center of the central maximum to the first order is 3 mm.

if we use: Sin of the angle = (M * Wavelength)/d =
sin of the angle = (1 * 500x10^-7) / .003

That gives the angle of the central maximum which we can then plug into
sin angle=wavelength/slit width?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does this look right or did i go wrong somewhere? Any help is appreciated greatly
 


To calculate the slit width, we can use the formula d = (m * λ)/sinθ, where d is the slit width, m is the order number, λ is the wavelength, and θ is the angle from the central maximum to the first order maximum. In this case, we are given the values of m = 1, λ = 500 nm, and θ = 3 mm/140 cm = 0.0214 rad. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

d = (1 * 500x10^-9)/sin(0.0214)
= (500x10^-9)/0.0214
= 0.0233 mm

Therefore, the slit width is approximately 0.0233 mm. This means that the slit should be very narrow in order to produce a diffraction pattern with distinct and well-separated maxima and minima.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
962
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
971
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K