Calculating Speed and Time of Nolan Ryan's Baseball Orbit on the Moon

  • Thread starter Thread starter JJ89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Physics
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the speed at which Nolan Ryan must throw a baseball to achieve a circular orbit on the moon, the correct formula involves gravitational parameters rather than V = G*R. The gravitational force acting on the baseball must equal the centripetal force required for circular motion. The correct orbital speed can be derived from the equation V = sqrt(G * mm / rm), where mm is the moon's mass and rm is its radius. The time taken to complete one orbit can be calculated using T = 2πrm / V. Proper understanding of satellite motion and gravitational equations is essential for accurate calculations.
JJ89
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Suppose that Nolan Ryan stands on the surface of the moon and throws a baseball horizontally. If the baseball has a high enough speed and does not strike any mountain, it can orbit around the moon and, after completing the orbit, strike Nolan from behind. The mass of the moon is mm = 7.35×(10*22power kg), and its radius is rm = 1740 km. The gravitation constant G = 6.67×10(-11power) Nm2/kg2.

a) Find the speed at which Nolan must throw the ball for such a circular orbit? V= ms

(b) How long (in hours) does the ball take to complete one orbit? T= hrs


is the equation V=G*R? if so i used 7.35*10to the 22nd power * 6.67 *10 to -11 power?
i got 4.90245e12, and it said i was wrong.



The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org


but i can't figure out the equation for B
 


did i do A right?
 


JJ89 said:
is the equation V=G*R? if so i used 7.35*10to the 22nd power * 6.67 *10 to -11 power?
i got 4.90245e12, and it said i was wrong.
No, the equation is not V = G*R. Look up the correct equation for satellite motion in a circular orbit in your textbook. You can also derive it using Newton's Second Law combined with Newton's Law of gravitation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top