Calculating Spring Constant for a Bungee Cord: Which Method is Correct?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the spring constant of a bungee cord using two different methods. Participants explore the implications of each method in the context of a bungee jumping scenario, considering the physics of forces and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents two methods for calculating the spring constant, yielding different results: 19.6 N/m and 49 N/m.
  • Another participant suggests that if the bungee cord stiffness is constant, the second method is correct, while the first method is deemed incorrect.
  • A participant expresses confusion regarding the variables in the first method and seeks clarification on the application of Hooke's law.
  • It is noted that at the lowest point of the jump, the upward force of the spring exceeds the weight of the jumper, which complicates the application of the first method.
  • A participant acknowledges the large value of the spring constant obtained from the second method, expressing surprise at its magnitude.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on which method is correct, with some arguing for the second method while others challenge the validity of the first method. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach to calculating the spring constant.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the assumptions made about the bungee cord's stiffness and the definitions of variables used in the calculations. The first method's application may depend on specific conditions that are not fully clarified.

the_awesome
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Hey guys. I'm trying to figure out the spring constant of a bungee cord.
Weight = 80kg
Gravity = 9.8m/s/s
Length of cord = 10m
Length of jump = 50m

I've been shown two different methods. And I don't know which one is correct because they give two different answers :/

1.
k = F/x = mg/x
Also knows as : k=Fx/x-x0

So i substitute: k= (80kg x 9.8) / (50-10)
k= 19.6 N/M

2.

PE=mgh
KE=0.5mv^2 = 0.5kx^2
F= -kx

mgh=0.5kx^2
80 x 9.8 x 50 = 0.5k x 40^2
therefore k= 49



So which method is correct? One gets 19.6, the other gets 49.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a homework question? If the bungee cord stiffness is constant (which is generally not the case), then the second method is correct. The first method is incorrect.
 
No it's not a hmwk question. I was at a bungee jumping place and I needed to do some calculations. The fact is that the 1st method is basically the same as the spring constant equation.

k= Fx / x - x0
However I do not know what x or x0 is so I'm confused.

So your saying that the 2nd method would hold true, if I was at a bungee jumping place, calculating the spring constant of the cord? If so then thankyou
 
the_awesome said:
No it's not a hmwk question. I was at a bungee jumping place and I needed to do some calculations. The fact is that the 1st method is basically the same as the spring constant equation.

k= Fx / x - x0
However I do not know what x or x0 is so I'm confused.
F = k(x-x0) is just Hooke's law for springs. x-x0 is how much the spring stretches from its unstretched length.

When the jumper is at the lowest point, the upward force of the spring is given by that equation, but that force does not equal the weight of the jumper. (The spring force is greater than the jumper's weight at that point.) As nvn says, the first method is incorrect.
 
Okay thankyou guys. 49 does seem like a massive spring constant. But thanx
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K