Calculating Statistical Operator $\hat{\rho}$

matematikuvol
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
<br /> \hat{\rho} = \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{1}{3} &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\[0.3em]<br /> 0 &amp; \frac{1}{3} &amp; 0 \\[0.3em]<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; \frac{1}{3} <br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />

If I have this statistical operator I get
i\hbar\frac{d\hat{\rho}}{dt}=0
So this is integral of motion and
[\hat{H},\hat{\rho}]=0
Is this correct? Tnx for your answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your operator is a constant multiple of the identity operator, so it commutes with any operator, in particular the Hamiltonian.
 
Of course. My example wasn't so good. Suppose I have matrix

<br /> \hat{\rho} = \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{1}{3} &amp; 5 &amp; 6 \\[0.3em]<br /> 5 &amp; \frac{1}{3} &amp; 6 \\[0.3em]<br /> 5 &amp; 6 &amp; \frac{1}{3} <br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />

Why now \hat{\rho} always commute with Hamiltonian?
 
Last edited:
What you have written is the state ρ in a fixed base for a given time t0.

Compare this with a ket vector, which can be represented as a column vector (1 2 3 ...)T for any fixed time t0.

In both cases, the states are initial values for the dynamical equations. Not their solutions for all times t.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top