Calculating Surface Area Perturbations in n-Sphere Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter andert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
andert
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Is anyone familiar with books or papers on perturbation theory for closed levels sets in which the equation for the n-sphere is perturbed? For example, the level set:

\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 + \epsilon p(x_i) = C

where \epsilon is a small parameter and p(x_i) is a positive polynomial such as x_i^4.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In particular, say A(C,\epsilon) is the "surface area". Then we can expand it:

A(C,\epsilon) = A(C,0) + \epsilon (dA/d\epsilon)(C,0) + \dots

How do I figure out what (d^nA/d\epsilon^n)(C,0) is from the equation for the level set?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
2
Replies
61
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top