Calculating Surface Area Perturbations in n-Sphere Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter andert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on perturbation theory related to closed level sets of the n-sphere, specifically examining how to calculate surface area perturbations when the level set equation is altered by a small parameter. The equation under consideration is the sum of squared variables plus a perturbation term, leading to an expression for surface area A(C, ε). Participants seek resources, such as books or papers, that detail methods for deriving the derivatives of surface area with respect to the perturbation parameter ε. The main challenge is determining the higher-order derivatives of A at ε=0 from the modified level set equation. Understanding these derivatives is crucial for analyzing the effects of perturbations on the surface area of the n-sphere.
andert
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Is anyone familiar with books or papers on perturbation theory for closed levels sets in which the equation for the n-sphere is perturbed? For example, the level set:

\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 + \epsilon p(x_i) = C

where \epsilon is a small parameter and p(x_i) is a positive polynomial such as x_i^4.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In particular, say A(C,\epsilon) is the "surface area". Then we can expand it:

A(C,\epsilon) = A(C,0) + \epsilon (dA/d\epsilon)(C,0) + \dots

How do I figure out what (d^nA/d\epsilon^n)(C,0) is from the equation for the level set?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
2
Replies
61
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top