Calculating Tensile Stress in a 40mm Rod with 200 KN Load | Formulas & Solutions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the tensile stress in a 40 mm diameter rod subjected to a 200 kN load. Participants explore the relevant formulas and the implications of accuracy in calculations, particularly in the context of coursework.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • The initial calculation of tensile stress using the formula tensile stress = force/area is presented, yielding a result of 159.24 N/mm².
  • One participant confirms the calculation as correct.
  • Another participant questions the precision of the result, suggesting that the level of accuracy may be excessive for practical purposes.
  • A further comment introduces the Poisson effect, indicating that the actual stress might be greater than calculated due to changes in cross-sectional area under tensile stress.
  • Concerns are raised about the appropriateness of significant figures in the calculation, prompting a discussion on the meaning and context of the results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the accuracy and significance of the calculated tensile stress. While some participants support the calculation, others express skepticism about its practical relevance and the implications of precision.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of considering the physical meaning behind calculations and the potential effects of assumptions, such as the Poisson effect, which may not have been accounted for in the initial calculation.

rad10k
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the tensile stress in a rod 40 mm in diameter with a load 200 KN ?


Homework Equations



pi*r^2



The Attempt at a Solution



3.14 * (20*20) = 1256 mm^2

200 * 1000 = 200 000 N

200 000 / 1256 = 159.24 N/mm^2

Tensile stress = 159.24 N/mm^2

Could anybody tell if this is correct and offer some guidance if its not? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
just to add I am using tensile stress = f/a
 
Looks good to me!
 
Thansk :o)
 
Comment: ridiculously "accurate" for practical purposes. Even 159 N/mm2 is slightly incredulous.
 
Not sure what you mean by that but its for course work not pratical purposes.
 
I just think that you should contemplate the meaning of what you have calculated. If you asked me what was the temperature in my room right now, and I replied that it was 15.36 degrees celsius, you would perhaps consider that the 6 was unnecessary, and possibly also the 3. There are a number of things that could be said about stress. One of them is that, under tensile stress the cross-sectional area gets smaller due to the Poisson effect (Like you see when you stretch a rubber band, and it gets thinner as well as longer). So the actual stress is bigger than you have calculated (although, admittedly, the people who define standards don't ask that people do recalculate the stress). But if you did, you would see how at least the last figure would change. I would challenge you also to say why you thought that 5 significant figures was the "correct" truncation of your result. Why not 7 or 3 or some other number. You can't answer that without asking other questions, such as "why do you want to know?". My plea is that you should not regard coursework as something to be finished, but rather some spur to getting more meaning out of it. Please think about the meaning of any calculation you do, and then choose an appropriate accuracy.
 
I can see your point I shall think about that when answering question in future . Though I don't want to hand some work in and then get the answer wrong because I rounded it too far .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
24K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K