Calculating Tensions in a Vertical Circular Motion Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in a rope during a stuntman's vertical circular motion. The problem involves determining the tension at various points in the arc, specifically at the start, at a height of 1.5 m, and at the bottom of the arc. The participant initially struggles with the calculations but uses energy conservation principles to find the velocity at 1.5 m height, leading to a tension calculation of 857 N. Concerns about the tension being too high are addressed by comparing it to the stuntman's weight, which helps validate the result. The conversation highlights the effectiveness of using conservation of energy for solving circular motion problems, a method often overlooked by students.
cy19861126
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A stuntman whose mass is 70 kg swings from the end of a 4.0-m-long rope along the arc of a vertical circle. Assuming he starts from rest when the rope is horizontal, find the tensions on the rope that are required to make him follow his circular path,(a) at the beginning of his motion, (b) at a height of 1.5 m above the bottom of the circular arc, and (c) at the bottom of his arc.


Homework Equations


F = ma
F = m * v^2/r


The Attempt at a Solution


a) Using the equation F = m*v^2/r, F is 0 because v is 0
b) First, I used the energy approach attempting to solve the problem:
mgh = 0.5mv^2 + mgh,
9.8 * 4 = 0.5 * v^2 + 9.8 * 1.5
v = 7m/s.

As I get velocity, I plugged the value into
F = m * v^2 / r
F = 70kg * 7^2 / 4
F = 857N

I do not think this is right, since the value is too large. Also, I found out that I can calculate the angle of the distance he travelled: arccos(2.5/4) = 0.89rad --> pi/2 - 0.89 rad = 0.68 rad, this is the angle which he travelled. But I do not know where to plug this in anywhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think this value is too large? Compare your tension with the weight of the stuntman; does the value seem more realistic now?
 
Last edited:
Hootenanny said:
Why do you think this value is too large? Compare your tension with the weight of the stuntman; does the value seem more realistic now?
Are you saying I did this right? Yeah, now you've said it, I think it is realistic... Wow, I thought I didn't get this chapter at all
 
cy19861126 said:
Are you saying I did this right? Yeah, now you've said it, I think it is realistic... Wow, I thought I didn't get this chapter at all
Yep it looks spot on to me :smile:. Conservation of energy is by far the easiest approach to solving circular motion, many students overlook this method initially as they want to use all the new equations (toys) they've been given :wink:. They forget their basic principles, well that's what I find anyway...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top