Calculating Terminal Velocity with Wind Resistance in Falling Objects

AI Thread Summary
Calculating terminal velocity for a fall from a 7th story building, approximately 70 feet, involves accounting for wind resistance and the initial jump height of about 8 inches. The impact speed, without significant air resistance, would be around 45 mph. Wind resistance complicates calculations as it varies based on the falling position, affecting speed as a square function. However, the difference in speed due to the jump is minimal, around 0.2 mph. Interestingly, smaller animals like mice experience much lower terminal velocities and can survive falls from great heights.
tombombodil
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My friends and I were having a discussion about falling and new the whole rate of acceleration and what not, but where unsure how to account for A) wind resistance and B) the act of jumping.

So assuming that we "jump" from a 7th story building, and assuming that each story is 10 feet, and all other factors are static. Assuming that One "jumps" roughly 8in 20.3cm, how would you go about calculating how fast you would be going when you hit the ground, accounting for wind resistance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can calculate how fast you would hit the ground from 70 ft, then to account for the "jump" you simply calculate how fast you would hit the ground from 70 ft + jump...which would be 70 ft and 8 in. Not much of a difference (around .2 mph)

Accounting for air resistance is not as easy because it depends on how you fall (straight as an arrow, flat with arms spread out, countless other positions), and it slows you down as a square function of your speed. However from a 7th story it probably wouldn't make much of a difference as you'd only be going about 45 mph.
 
No problem if you happen to be a mouse, apparently. Their terminal velocity is very low and they can just walk (/limp?) away after landing.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top