How much less wind resistance will a round skyscraper have?

In summary, for a school project about skyscrapers, the question is raised about the difference in wind resistance between a round skyscraper and a standard rectangular one. The main concern is not the shape itself, but the vortex shedding. The drag coefficient for a generic elliptical shape, similar to an egg, is discussed as a potential average for the presentation. However, there is a significant disadvantage to using an elliptical shape instead of a circular one, which should be mentioned in the presentation. This disadvantage is related to the potential for significant lift perpendicular to the wind if the wind is not perfectly aligned with the symmetry axis of the shape.
  • #1
Batmoosemike
8
0
For a school project, I need to know how much less wind resistance a round skyscraper will have compared to a standard rectangular one. You can assume the skyscraper will simply be a generic elliptical shape, somewhat similar to an egg. Answer doesn't have to be extremely specific, I just need an average to put into my presentation.

We need to make a proposal talking about the benefits of round skyscrapers vs standard, rectangular ones.

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Batmoosemike said:
a generic elliptical shape, somewhat similar to an egg.
There is a significant disadvantage to using an elliptical shape instead of a circular one. Can you think of what that might be? It should be mentioned in your presentation... :smile:
 
  • #4
berkeman said:
There is a significant disadvantage to using an elliptical shape instead of a circular one. Can you think of what that might be? It should be mentioned in your presentation... :smile:
I really can't think of what you're referring to. Could you please explain?
 
  • #5
Batmoosemike said:
You can assume the skyscraper will simply be a generic elliptical shape, somewhat similar to an egg
Is the wind always coming from the same direction? Your shape might have less drag, but could produce significant lift perpendicular to the wind, if the wind is not perfectly aligned with the symmetry axis.
 
  • #6
Batmoosemike said:
I really can't think of what you're referring to. Could you please explain?
See A.T.'s reply above this one, and also think about what happens at all given wind directions...
 

1. How does the shape of a skyscraper affect wind resistance?

The shape of a skyscraper greatly affects its wind resistance. A round shape will have significantly less wind resistance compared to a rectangular or square shape. This is because a round shape has a smaller surface area exposed to the wind, reducing the force of the wind on the building.

2. How much less wind resistance will a round skyscraper have compared to a rectangular one?

It is difficult to determine an exact percentage of how much less wind resistance a round skyscraper will have compared to a rectangular one. However, studies have shown that a round shape can reduce wind loads by up to 30% compared to a rectangular shape.

3. Will a round skyscraper sway more in high winds?

Yes, a round skyscraper may sway slightly more in high winds compared to a rectangular one. However, this sway is typically minimal and well within safe limits. The round shape also allows for a more streamlined distribution of wind forces, reducing the risk of structural damage.

4. Do round skyscrapers have any other advantages besides less wind resistance?

Aside from reduced wind resistance, round skyscrapers have several other advantages. They are more aerodynamic, making them more energy-efficient and reducing the need for additional structural support. They also have a more visually appealing and unique design compared to traditional rectangular skyscrapers.

5. Are there any disadvantages to building a round skyscraper?

One potential disadvantage of a round skyscraper is that it may be more expensive to construct compared to a rectangular one. The circular shape can also limit the amount of usable interior space. However, with advancements in technology and building materials, these disadvantages can be minimized.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Engineering
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
943
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top