Calculating the Atlantic Ocean's Widening: A Plate Tectonics Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the time it would take for the Atlantic Ocean to widen by one kilometer, given a plate movement rate of 3 cm/yr along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Participants explore unit conversion and the implications for the calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests converting 3 cm/yr to km/yr as a first step in solving the problem.
  • Another participant explains the technique of "multiplying by one" to convert units, providing examples of how to cancel units during conversion.
  • A participant questions whether the correct conversion factor is 100 cm per km or 100,000 cm per km, leading to different potential answers for the time calculation.
  • Another participant sets up a formula relating change in distance to change in time, indicating a method to derive the time required for the ocean to widen.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the correct conversion factor for centimeters to kilometers, leading to differing calculations of the time required for the ocean to widen. No consensus is reached on the final answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not clarify the assumptions behind their unit conversions, and the discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps necessary to arrive at a definitive answer.

globetrotter269
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Any help would be much appreciated with this problem.
The problem is: The rate of plate movement along portions of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge has been determined to be 3 cm/yr. At this rate how long will it take the Atlantic Ocean to widen another one kilometer?

I think what you need to do is first change the the 3 cm/yr into km/yr and then go from there. But I'm not sure how to do that and what to do after that.

Thank's in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A technique that works well for converting one type of units to another is "multiply by one." When the numerator of a fraction is equal to the denominator, the value of the fraction is one. i.e. you can multiply by \frac{1 foot}{12 inches} or you could multiply by \frac{12 inches}{1 foot}

So, if I was changing 3cm/hour to something else, (I intentionally changed it a little bit), I could do this:
\frac{3 cm}{1 hour}*\frac{1 meter}{100 cm}
Note, when you're multiplying the fractions together, since you have the units cm in the numerator and in the denominator, you can cancel them out. The fraction \frac{1 meter}{100 cm} is equal to 1. The resulting units from this operation will be
\frac{3}{1 hour}*\frac{1 meter}{100} Taking care of the number part, you have .03 and the units are meters/hour.

You can do the entire conversion by taking the product of several conversion fractions (each with the numerator equal to the denominator; thus each time you're multiplying by one which results in an identical quantity although the number and units change) i.e. like this:

\frac{3 cm}{1 hour}*\frac{1 meter}{100 cm}*\frac{1 kilometer}{1000 meters}*\frac{1 hour}{60 minutes}. . .

Note: the cm's cancel, then the meters cancel, resulting in kilometers. Then, the hours cancel, resulting in units of minutes. I realize that in your case, you'll probably want to leave the answer in terms of years, although you could convert to centuries.
 
Last edited:
So, for my particular problem would the multiplication be:

3 cm/1 yr x 1 km/100 cm?
Resulting in an answer of 300 years?

or, would it be 3 cm/1 yr x 1km/100,000 cm
Resulting in an answer of 300,000 years?
 
Last edited:
Well, are there 100 cm per km or 100,000?

I'd set it up like this, anyways.

\frac{change in distance}{change in time}

=\frac{\Delta d}{\Delta t}

\frac{3 cm}{year} = \frac{\Delta d}{\Delta t}

{\Delta t} = \frac{\Delta d}{3 \frac{cm}{year}}
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K