Calculating the Atlantic Ocean's Widening: A Plate Tectonics Question

AI Thread Summary
To calculate how long it will take for the Atlantic Ocean to widen another kilometer at a rate of 3 cm/year, first convert 3 cm/year to kilometers. This involves using conversion factors: 3 cm is equal to 0.00003 km (since 1 km = 100,000 cm). To find the time required for a 1 km widening, divide 1 km by the rate of 0.00003 km/year, resulting in approximately 33,333 years. The discussion emphasizes the importance of unit conversion in solving the problem accurately. Thus, the Atlantic Ocean will take about 33,333 years to widen by another kilometer at the given rate.
globetrotter269
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Any help would be much appreciated with this problem.
The problem is: The rate of plate movement along portions of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge has been determined to be 3 cm/yr. At this rate how long will it take the Atlantic Ocean to widen another one kilometer?

I think what you need to do is first change the the 3 cm/yr into km/yr and then go from there. But I'm not sure how to do that and what to do after that.

Thank's in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A technique that works well for converting one type of units to another is "multiply by one." When the numerator of a fraction is equal to the denominator, the value of the fraction is one. i.e. you can multiply by \frac{1 foot}{12 inches} or you could multiply by \frac{12 inches}{1 foot}

So, if I was changing 3cm/hour to something else, (I intentionally changed it a little bit), I could do this:
\frac{3 cm}{1 hour}*\frac{1 meter}{100 cm}
Note, when you're multiplying the fractions together, since you have the units cm in the numerator and in the denominator, you can cancel them out. The fraction \frac{1 meter}{100 cm} is equal to 1. The resulting units from this operation will be
\frac{3}{1 hour}*\frac{1 meter}{100} Taking care of the number part, you have .03 and the units are meters/hour.

You can do the entire conversion by taking the product of several conversion fractions (each with the numerator equal to the denominator; thus each time you're multiplying by one which results in an identical quantity although the number and units change) i.e. like this:

\frac{3 cm}{1 hour}*\frac{1 meter}{100 cm}*\frac{1 kilometer}{1000 meters}*\frac{1 hour}{60 minutes}. . .

Note: the cm's cancel, then the meters cancel, resulting in kilometers. Then, the hours cancel, resulting in units of minutes. I realize that in your case, you'll probably want to leave the answer in terms of years, although you could convert to centuries.
 
Last edited:
So, for my particular problem would the multiplication be:

3 cm/1 yr x 1 km/100 cm?
Resulting in an answer of 300 years?

or, would it be 3 cm/1 yr x 1km/100,000 cm
Resulting in an answer of 300,000 years?
 
Last edited:
Well, are there 100 cm per km or 100,000?

I'd set it up like this, anyways.

\frac{change in distance}{change in time}

=\frac{\Delta d}{\Delta t}

\frac{3 cm}{year} = \frac{\Delta d}{\Delta t}

{\Delta t} = \frac{\Delta d}{3 \frac{cm}{year}}
 
Last edited:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top