Calculating the Maximum Compression of a Spring

AI Thread Summary
To find the maximum compression of a spring when a block is dropped onto it, the potential energy of the block (Ep = mgh) must equal the spring's potential energy (Ep = 1/2 kx^2). The initial equation needs to account for the additional distance the block moves down the spring, leading to the modified equation mg(h+x) = 1/2 kx^2. Solving this quadratic equation provides two solutions for x, with the correct maximum compression being approximately 0.142 m. The discussion emphasizes the importance of including the spring's displacement in the energy calculations.
soul5
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of mass m = 3.4 kg is dropped from height h = 44 cm onto a spring of spring constant k = 1920 N/m (Fig. 8-38). Find the maximum distance the spring is compressed.

[PLAIN]http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1650/art/qb/qu/c08/fig08_36.gif



Homework Equations



Ep=mgh

Ep=1/2kx^2



The Attempt at a Solution





Ok so I found the Potential Energy Ep=mgh. That energy should equal to 1/2kx^2.

So I set mgh = 1/2kx^2 to solve for x but my answer was wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your choice to use kinetic and potential energy is correct, but you are missing one small thing.

The distance the block moves down along the spring (that is, the distance the spring is displaced x) still counts as gravitational potential energy for the block. So modifying the equation you have to take this into account will yield:

mg(h+x) = .5kx^2

From here you can solve for x, the displacement of the spring. Since it is a quadratic, you will get 2 different answers, but it should be clear which one is the correct answer.
 
What was your answer for x, I got 0.1236m.
 
Gorz said:
What was your answer for x, I got 0.1236m.



that's what I got to the first time, but it was wrong...
 
if you try what I mentioned you will get x=.142m which I believe is the correct answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top