Calculating the normal vector to a surface

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding a unit normal vector to the surface defined by the equation z = x^2*y + x*y^4 at a specific point (1,1,2). The context is within vector calculus, particularly focusing on normal vectors and gradients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the normal vector using partial derivatives and the concept of unit vectors. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the initial vector and the process of normalizing it. There is exploration of different methods to arrive at the same result.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the calculation of the normal vector and the normalization process. Some participants have clarified their understanding of unit vectors, while others have noted that different methods yield consistent results.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the normalization of the vector and the specific form of the answer provided. Participants are also considering the implications of the gradient in relation to the surface.

NewtonianAlch
Messages
453
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the unit vector with positive z component which is normal to the surface z = x^2*y + x*y^4 at the point (1,1,2) on the surface

The Attempt at a Solution



So I find:

dz/dx = 2xy +y^4
dz/dy = x^2 + 4xy^3

Substitute (1,1) in those equations and get dz/dx = 3, and dz/dy = 5

So now we have (3, 5, -1)

Multiply by -1 and now we have (-3, -5, 1), but it's apparently wrong.

However the answer was (-3/35*sqrt(35), -1/7*sqrt(35), 1/35*sqrt(35))

I haven't the faintest idea as to how that came about, well...it seems to have been multiplied by sqrt(35)/35, except for the second component which appears to have something else done to it.

I looked around for how the normal vector is calculated in my book, and online too; it's pretty much what I've done.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the vector (-3, -5, 1) a unit vector? How would you make it a unit vector?
 
Hmm, had to check this up, was not familiar with it. So it seems I have to divide the vector by the square root of the squares of the x,y,z components?

Which would mean square root(9 + 25 + 1) = [itex]\sqrt{35}[/itex]

That leaves us with 1/[itex]\sqrt{35}[/itex]
multiplied by the vector components multiplied by -1.

Which gives a vector of <-3/[itex]\sqrt{35}[/itex], -5/[itex]\sqrt{35}[/itex], 1/[itex]\sqrt{35}[/itex]>

Which is a lot closer than my last attempt. Did I miss something somewhere?
 
Nvm, I see it's the same answer, just a different form.
 
The gradient of a function, f, is always perpendicular to the surface f(x,y,z)= constant.
So the first thing I would do is write your equation as [itex]f(x, y, z)= z- x^2y + xy^4= 0[/itex], then find [itex]\nabla f[/itex]. Finally, calculate the length of that vector and divide by its length.
 
Both methods are used, and gives the same result as that of the OP.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K