Calculating the Probability of a Shared Birthday among n People

  • Thread starter Thread starter buddingscientist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
buddingscientist
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Suppose a room contains n people. Assuming that days of the year are equally likely to be birthdays for each person, calculate the probability that at least two of the people have a common birthday.

well I have the answer but I'm just curious as to the thought processes you go through to answer it.


what I've done (incorrectly) is:

if n = 2, P = 1/365^2
if n = 3, P = 1/365^2 (person 1, 2) + 1/365^2 (person 1, 3) + 1/365^2 (person 2, 3)

and generalized it to:
( 3 + (n sum i=3) (i)! / (i-1)! ) / 365^2

there's no question that it's wrong but that's the process I take
 
Physics news on Phys.org
work out the probability they all have different birthdays and subtract that from 1. Obviously if there are 366 people in the room the probabilit must be 1, mustn't it? (excludeing leap year things). Does n=366 give P=1 in your answer?
 
probably not (npi), I know my answer is wrong, you recommend using conjugates (1 - P(all different)), I'll work on it some more, thanks for your response
 
Ignoring leap years:

P(bd2 = bd1) = 1/365
P(bd2 != bd1) = 364/365
P(bd3 = bd1) + P(bd3 = bd2) = 2/365, given that bd1 != bd2
P(bd3 != bd1) AND P(bd3 != bd2) = 363/365

Therefore P(bd1 != bd2 != bd3) = 1 - (363/365) * (364/365)

So for any n,
P(two birthdays are the same) =
1 - (((365-(n-1))*(365-(n-2))...(364))/(365^n))
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top