Calculating the Riemann Sum of (cos1)^x

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around calculating the Riemann sum of the function (cos(1))^x, which participants clarify is actually a geometric series rather than a Riemann sum. The series converges due to the absolute value of cos(1) being less than 1, leading to the formula for the sum as cos(1)/(1-cos(1)). Participants debate the accuracy of numerical approximations, with one suggesting an approximate value of 1.175, while others emphasize the importance of providing exact expressions. Additionally, there is confusion regarding the interpretation of cos(1) in degrees versus radians, which affects the numerical results. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in mathematical terminology and precision in calculations.
pureouchies4717
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
hi, is it possible to find the riemann sum of (cos1)^x?

it looks divergent to me

can someome please help me... even if it is convergent, i don't know how to find the sum of a trigonometric function
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eeh, do you mean (cos(1))^x?
 
nick727kcin said:
hi, is it possible to find the riemann sum of (cos1)^x?

it looks divergent to me

can someome please help me... even if it is convergent, i don't know how to find the sum of a trigonometric function

Did you really mean the riemann sum? Or did you mean the sum of the infinite series? Well since cos(0) = 1 and cos(pi) = -1 etc.. Then for any x that is not a multiple of pi |cos(x)| will be less than 1. Since this absolute value is less than 1 the geometric series will converge, specifically it will converge to a/(1-r) where a is the first term, and r is the common ratio.
 
thanks a lot for the input guys

can someone please tell me if 1.175 is right? thanks
 
Last edited:
nick727kcin said:
thanks a lot for the input guys

can someone please tell me if 1.175 is right? thanks

Where is the sum from? From 0 to infinity or what?
 
1.175 is definitely not "right". What you've got is a geometric series, and you should be able to get a simple, exact expression for the sum, rather than an approximation.
 
nick727kcin said:
thanks a lot for the input guys

can someone please tell me if 1.175 is right? thanks

yes, that is correct.
 
ah i think i got it

i think the sum would be .540
 
arildno said:
1.175 is definitely not "right". What you've got is a geometric series, and you should be able to get a simple, exact expression for the sum, rather than an approximation.

well, you are right. But his answer is correct within 4 sig figs. I assumed he wanted a numerical, approximate value.
 
  • #10
thanks so much for the help guys :!)


but now I am kinda confused:smile:
 
  • #11
Since there isn't said anywhere whether cos(1) is the cosine to 1 degree or to 1 radian, for example, the numerical answers are just meaningless.
 
  • #12
arildno said:
Since there isn't said anywhere whether cos(1) is the cosine to 1 degree or to 1 radian, for example, the numerical answers are just meaningless.

o, its to the radians
 
  • #13
And why is it "right" just to keep 4 significant figures? Why not 15, or just 1?
Nothing in what you posted gives any suggestion of what appoximation scheme you ought to use.
 
  • #14
ok here's what i did to get the 1.7... figure:

you said that it converges to a/(1-r)

A. a1= cos1
r= cos1 (right?)

so then: cos1/(1-cos1)

this comes out to 1.7



B. this is how i got the .5... answer:
a/(1-r)
a1= cos1
r= (cos1)^k

cos1/(1-(cos1)^k)

then i took the limits (cos1)^k becomes 0

so its: cos1/(1)= cos1 or .5...
 
  • #15
To be to the point:
Why are you so reluctant to give your answer as the exact expression
cos(1)/(1-cos(1)) ??
 
  • #16
o ok

hmm i just felt like rounding. thanks guys/girls
 
  • #17
nick727kcin said:
ok here's what i did to get the 1.7... figure:

you said that it converges to a/(1-r)

A. a1= cos1
r= cos1 (right?)

so then: cos1/(1-cos1)

this comes out to 1.7



B. this is how i got the .5... answer:
a/(1-r)
a1= cos1
r= (cos1)^k

cos1/(1-(cos1)^k)

then i took the limits (cos1)^k becomes 0

so its: cos1/(1)= cos1 or .5...

Well for case B, if you even just write out the first few terms of the eries you should see that that definitely cannot be the answer because you have

cos(1) + cos2(1) + cos3(1) + ...

As you can see the first term in that series is about .54... and since none of those terms are ever negative the sum of the series must be larger than the first term about .54...

Case A gives you an approximation of the correct sum of this series.
 
  • #18
I'm glad you finally posted this, since finally, we can get rid of some misconceptions you show here.
nick727kcin said:
B. this is how i got the .5... answer:
a/(1-r)
a1= cos1
r= (cos1)^k

cos1/(1-(cos1)^k)

then i took the limits (cos1)^k becomes 0

so its: cos1/(1)= cos1 or .5...
A geometric series is of the form:
S=a*r^{0}+ar^{2}+++ar^{k}+
where a and r are real numbers, and |r|<1
In your case, your series is:
\cos(1)*(\cos(1))^{0}+\cos(1)*(\cos(1))^{1}+++\cos(1)*(\cos(1))^{k}+++
Thus, a=r=cos(1)
 
  • #19
thanks everyone :)

and also,

i don't want to flood the board with topics, so can you guys please help with something else?

how is arctan(2n) divergent when, if you make n a big number, it clearly has a limit of 1.57?
 
  • #20
nick727kcin said:
thanks everyone :)

and also,

i don't want to flood the board with topics, so can you guys please help with something else?

how is arctan(2n) divergent when, if you make n a big number, the answer comes out to 90?

ex:

a50= 89.4
a1000000=90

I'm assuming you mean the infinite series with a general term of arctan(2n). Well it's usually the first test for convergence/divergence that you learn: that if the series converges then the limit of the terms as n goes to infinity must be 0, thus if the terms don't go to 0 then the series diverges.
 
  • #21
1. It doesn't have a limit at 1.57.

2. It isn't divergent.
 
  • #22
Just a question:
Whatever did this thread have to do with RIEMANN sums?? :confused:
 
  • #23
o I am sorry for the confusion... i meant normal sums

so arctan2n doesn't have a sum right? because its divergent?
 
  • #24
nick727kcin said:
ok here's what i did to get the 1.7... figure:

you said that it converges to a/(1-r)

A. a1= cos1
r= cos1 (right?)

so then: cos1/(1-cos1)

That's the answer. There is nothing else to do..

(that comes out to 1.17534265...but I have been chastised for writing an approcimate numerical value so I will say that the answer is cos(1)/(1-cos(1)) )
 
  • #25
The point is that you still haven't told us precisely what the problem was!

The geometric sum \Sigma_{i=0}^\infty (cos(1))^n is a "geometric series", not a "Riemann Sum" (those are the finite sums used to define an integral). As Arildno said, you haven't stated whether that is 1 radian or 1 degree (although, I would say that, as long as we are talking about the cosine function as opposed to a trigonometry problem, radians should be assumed) and you haven't justified keeping only 4 significant figures.

Since the the geometric series \sigma_{i= 0}{\infty}ar^n has sum \frac{a}{1- r}, as long as |r|< 1, as is cos(1). In your problem, a= cos(1) (since the sum starts at k= 1, not 0) and r= cos(1) (not "(cos(1)k)" . The sum is \frac{cos(1)}{1- cos(1)}.

Since the common ratio is cos(1) rather than cos(1)k, you do not take the limit as k goes to infinity. Indeed, if that were correct, for |r|< 1, the sum of \sigma_{i=0}^{\infty}ar^n would always be just a.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #26
If you want the sum to infinity, is it not simply \frac{\cos1}{1 - \cos1}, which equals 1.1753426496700214107767867596561. Also, 1-co1 is the same as 2(sin0.5)^2, if that helps.
 
  • #27
finchie_88 said:
If you want the sum to infinity, is it not simply \frac{\cos1}{1 - \cos1}, which equals 1.1753426496700214107767867596561
No, it doesn't, at least not with radians or degrees as your angular measure.
 
  • #28
arildno said:
No, it doesn't, at least not with radians or degrees as your angular measure.

Yes it is, the method I used:
1. Put calculator in radian mode.
2. calculate cos1.
3. calculate 1-ans.
4. calculate cos1/previous ans.

Overall answer = 1.175 to 3 d.p.
 
  • #29
finchie_88 said:
Yes it is, the method I used:
1. Put calculator in radian mode.
2. calculate cos1.
3. calculate 1-ans.
4. calculate cos1/previous ans.

Overall answer = 1.175 to 3 d.p.
finchie_88, exact solutions are always the best. So giving the answer as:
<br /> \frac{\cos 1}{1 - \cos 1} is more preferable than giving it in the form: 1.175 to 3 d.p..
No? :)
This is arildno's point, I believe.
 
  • #30
finchie_88 said:
Yes it is, the method I used:
1. Put calculator in radian mode.
2. calculate cos1.
3. calculate 1-ans.
4. calculate cos1/previous ans..
No it isn't.
Learn the difference between exact and approximate answers.
What do think your calculator answer is in this case?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K