Calculating the variance with a TWIST

  • Thread starter Thread starter apoechma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variance
apoechma
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Calculating the variance with a TWIST!

Hello! I am trying to understand this problem! its just on my practice questions and Ihave the answer, I CAN NOT understand how to set it up! PLEASE someon ehelpo!

THis is it :)

A student wants to calculate the variance of a set of 10 scores. But he doesn't have hte raw scores, but only has the deviation of each raw score from the mean. Worse yet he only has 9 of tese deviation scores...

compute the variance for him

-5, +11, -4, -2, +7, -8, -6, +1, -3
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well, the mean of the deviations from the mean must be zero, so to find the 10th score deviation, pick the one that makes the mean of the 10 values equal to 0.

Then just compute the variance of those 10; remember, variance is unchanged by equal shifts of all the values
 


Your first step in calculating the variance would be to take the distance from each element to the mean, right? So it shouldn't be a problem that this is done for you. The last missing distance will of course be the negative of the sum of the other distances, since the overall sum needs to be 0 (otherwise, the mean wouldn't be the mean!).
 


Once you have the tenth deviation, the sample variance is the sum of the squares of these deviations divided by n-1.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top