Calculating the Volumetric Strain for a Rectangular Steel Bar

  • Thread starter Thread starter cicatriz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strain
AI Thread Summary
A rectangular steel bar is subjected to various forces, and the goal is to calculate the change in volume under these conditions. Initial calculations yielded volumetric strain values, but the resulting change in volume was deemed incorrect. A suggestion was made to use a different formula for change in volume, specifically ΔV=V0[(1+ε1)(1+ε2)(1+ε3)-1]. The revised approach indicates that the change in volume should be approximately double the initially calculated value. Accurate calculations are essential for determining the correct volumetric strain in the bar.
cicatriz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rectangular steel bar has length 250 mm, width 50 mm, and thickness 25 mm. The bar is subjected to a compressive force of 450 kN on the 250 mm x 50 mm face, a tensile force of 450 kN on the 250 mm x 25 mm face, and a tensile force of 45 kN on the 50 mm x 25 mm face.

(a) Find the change in volume of the bar under the force system.


Homework Equations



The forces can be assumed to be uniformly distributed over the respective faces.

Take E = 200 kN/mm^{2} and Poissons ratio = 0.26

The Attempt at a Solution



I have calculated \sigmax = -0.036 kN/mm^{2}, \sigmay = 0.072 kN/mm^{2} and \sigmaz = 0.036 kN/mm^{2}.

With these values, using Hooke's Law: \epsilon = 1/E[\sigma1 - \upsilon(\sigma2 + \sigma3)] I have calculated:

\epsilonx = 3.6x10^{-4}, \epsilony = -3.204x10^{-4} and \epsilonz = 1.332x10^{-4}.

Furthermore, using the equation for volumetric strain: \nablaV/Vo = \epsilon(1-2\upsilon) I have calculated the change in volume to be 25.92 mm^{2}. This, according to the answer I have been provided with, appears to be incorrect.

I would appreciate any guidance with this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi cicatriz, welcome to PF. Try using this equation for change in volume:

\Delta V=V_0\left[(1+\epsilon_1)(1+\epsilon_2)(1+\epsilon_3)-1\right]

I'm not sure how the other one was derived (hydrostatic pressure maybe?) but it doesn't look right. I checked your strain values and they look fine. The change in volume should be about twice what you got previously.
 
Back
Top