Calculating Travel Time of Proton Across Galaxy Using Special Relativity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the travel time of a proton across a galaxy, approximately 10^5 light years in width, using principles of special relativity. The original poster is tasked with determining the time taken from both the galaxy's rest frame and the proton's rest frame, given the proton's energy of about 10^19 eV.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use Lorentz transformations to find the time in the proton's frame but encounters difficulties with calculations and accuracy. Some participants suggest checking unit conversions and the implications of the distance in the proton's frame.
  • Questions arise regarding the appropriate use of energy equations, with discussions on whether to use total energy or kinetic energy, and the relevance of the proton's mass in calculations.
  • Participants also explore the relationship between the calculated times and the accuracy of the values used, including the mass of the proton and the number of days in a year.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants providing hints and suggestions for approaching the problem. There is no explicit consensus, but some guidance has been offered regarding the use of gamma and the implications of the proton's frame of reference.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential inaccuracies in calculations due to the precision of constants used, such as the mass of the proton and the conversion factors for time. The original poster expresses uncertainty about achieving the exact answer required, indicating a focus on the accuracy of their calculations.

bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0
Special Relativity URGENT!

Homework Statement



The galaxy is about 10^5 light years across and the most energetic cosmic rays known have energies of the order of 10^19 eV. How long would it take a proton with this energy to cross the Galaxy as measured in the rest frame of (i) the galaxy (ii) the proton

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So I've done (i) and got the right answer (10^5 years) since to the best accuracy of my calculator, the particle is traveling at the speed of light...

For part (ii) I want to use lorentz transform, but i can't seem to get my calculator to take the accuracy..

basically: ct' = gamma(ct-Bx) where B is v rel..

now i found gamma to be (1.06699... x 10^10) which means B is root(1 - 8.798...x10^-21)
now on my calculator this gives a value of B of 1, which obviously means t' = 0...The actual answer gives t' as just over 4 minutes...

I'm wondering if there is another way to work out t'..how can i compute it to get the answer required!?

THANKS :) !
 
Physics news on Phys.org


bon said:
For part (ii) I want to use lorentz transform, but i can't seem to get my calculator to take the accuracy..
Hint: From the proton's frame, what's the distance across the galaxy? (All you need is gamma.)


(Don't give all your threads the same title! :smile:)
 


Are you making sure to convert the distance in light years to meters & standardizing your units?
 


Chewy0087 said:
Are you making sure to convert the distance in light years to meters & standardizing your units?

You shouldn't need to convert it all to meteres..
 


Doc Al said:
Hint: From the proton's frame, what's the distance across the galaxy? (All you need is gamma.)


(Don't give all your threads the same title! :smile:)

Ok so x' = x/gamma, but then how do i work out t', because v' = 0? since it is in the rest frame of the proton...

also, was i right in using e = Mc^2/gamma for the first part, rather than E^2 = m^2 c^4 + p^2 m^2??

When do i know when to use the former and when to use the latter?
 


anyone?
 


bon said:
Ok so x' = x/gamma, but then how do i work out t', because v' = 0? since it is in the rest frame of the proton...
In the proton's frame it's the galaxy that is moving.

also, was i right in using e = Mc^2/gamma for the first part, rather than E^2 = m^2 c^4 + p^2 m^2??
I'd use KE = mc^2(gamma - 1).

When do i know when to use the former and when to use the latter?
It's just a matter of convenience.
 


Doc Al said:
I'd use KE = mc^2(gamma - 1).

Shouldn't it come to the same though?

And how can you use this? You aren't told its KE, you are told its total E..

Also, surely by doing it your way with x', you encounter the same problem since v(rel) is the same value i couldn't work out accurately enough previously...

for this reason, my answer turns out to be 4.93mins, when it should be 4.96 mins..

how can I get 4.96 mins?

thanks again for your help..
 


Did you use the exact mass of the proton?

Anyway, the problem says that the energy is of the order of 10^19 eV. So, I would not even bother to get the last decimal correct. I would solve this problem as follows. I would not bother looking up the precise mass of the proton, as I already know that it is of the order of one GeV.

Whether the 10^19 eV is supposed to be the total energy or just the inetic energy is irrelevant. I can already tell that the gamma factor is of the order of 10^10. And that then means that the proper time for the proton is 10^(-5) years = 0.00365 days (including extra decimals for clarity). Converting to hours is easy if you use that 24 is of the order of 25 and 25*4 = 100. So we find that the proper time is about 0.36/4 hours = 0.09 hours = of the order of 5 minutes.
 
  • #10


Count Iblis said:
Did you use the exact mass of the proton?

Anyway, the problem says that the energy is of the order of 10^19 eV. So, I would not even bother to get the last decimal correct. I would solve this problem as follows. I would not bother looking up the precise mass of the proton, as I already know that it is of the order of one GeV.

Whether the 10^19 eV is supposed to be the total energy or just the inetic energy is irrelevant. I can already tell that the gamma factor is of the order of 10^10. And that then means that the proper time for the proton is 10^(-5) years = 0.00365 days (including extra decimals for clarity). Converting to hours is easy if you use that 24 is of the order of 25 and 25*4 = 100. So we find that the proper time is about 0.36/4 hours = 0.09 hours = of the order of 5 minutes.

Okay thanks - useful to see, but unfortunately not what I've been asked to do.
 
  • #11


bon said:
You shouldn't need to convert it all to meteres..

I know you don't need to but if you convert everything into metres/seconds it's a lot more structured and quicker overall.

your answer is extremeley close given the huge inaccuracies, check the mass of the proton to another significant figure maybe, also did you use 365 or 365.25 for number of days in a year? on second thought that wouldn't make much difference at all really, perhaps your value for gamma is on the short side...
 
Last edited:
  • #12


I also find 4.93 minutes using the exact proton mass and 365.26 days/year. To answer your question "how can I get 4.96 mins", you have to go beyond special relativity and apply some simple logic.

Consider the ratio: 4.96/4.93 = 1.006

If you take the proton mass you used and multiply that with 1.006, you get the desired answer.

The proton mass is 1.67262158 × 10^(-27) kg

Multiplying by 1.006 gives:

1.68 × 10^(-27) kg

The neutron mass is:

1.67492729 × 10^(-27) kg

We see that the mass equals the neutron mass to almost 3 significant figures. The fact that the proper time of 5 minutes is less than the neutron's half life suggests to me that the person who formulated the problem originally formulated it in terms of neutrons, perhaps asking if the neutron could cross the galaxy. He could have changed his mind (perhaps because asking that already gives away the clue that the proper time would be very small) but forgot to replace the neutron mass by the proton mass.
 
  • #13


bon said:
Shouldn't it come to the same though?

And how can you use this? You aren't told its KE, you are told its total E..
When they tell you the energy of some particle, usually they are talking about its KE. But to the accuracy you need, it doesn't matter.

Also, surely by doing it your way with x', you encounter the same problem since v(rel) is the same value i couldn't work out accurately enough previously...
The answer is, of course, close enough to c that it doesn't matter for calculating the time of travel. If, for some reason, you wanted to find a more accurate value for the speed, rather than calculate it directly, calculate its difference from c. Replace beta with β = 1 - x, where x << 1. Then you can find x given gamma. You'll find x to be so small that using c is good enough.

for this reason, my answer turns out to be 4.93mins, when it should be 4.96 mins..

how can I get 4.96 mins?
Beats me. Perhaps they used a different value for the rest mass of the proton. Regardless, your answer is well within the accuracy of your data.

What textbook are you using?
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K