Calculating Uncertainty, involving a logarithmic quantity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the uncertainty in absolute magnitude (M) using the formula M = m - 5 log10 (d/10). The key equation for uncertainty in the logarithmic quantity μ is Δμ = 5 * (Δd / d * ln(10)). Participants confirm that this method provides a reliable estimate of overall error, emphasizing the importance of including ln(10) in the denominator for accuracy. The calculations involve associated errors Δm and Δd for the variables m and d.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with error propagation techniques in measurements
  • Knowledge of absolute magnitude calculations in astronomy
  • Basic proficiency in calculus, specifically differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study error propagation in logarithmic functions
  • Learn about absolute magnitude and its significance in astronomy
  • Explore the application of natural logarithms in scientific calculations
  • Investigate advanced techniques for calculating uncertainties in measurements
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students involved in measurements and calculations of absolute magnitude, as well as anyone interested in understanding error propagation in logarithmic contexts.

Rodger
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Essentially I'm asking if the uncertainty in μ = -5 log10 (d/10) is given by Δμ = 5 * ( Δd / d*ln(10) )


1. The problem, all variables and given/known data

I am to calculate the uncertainty in absolute magnitude (M), which is calculated using an equation involving logs.

The equation for M is: M = m - 5 log10 (d/10) where m and d have associated errors Δm and Δd.


The Attempt at a Solution



I introduce: μ = -5 log10 (d/10) such that M = m + μ

Then I calculate the error in μ whereby: Δμ = 5 * ( Δd / d*ln(10) )

I then calculate the error in M by:

ΔM2 = [ Δm2 + Δμ2 ]

Any comments on this would be greatly appreciated as I have 0 confidence in myself when it comes to calculating errors.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes that method will give you a good estimate of the overall error.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yes, provided that ln10 is in the denominator.

Chet
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K