Calculating Velocity After Impact: What Went Wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkFalz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity Wall
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of velocity after a ball impacts a wall. The initial momentum of the ball is correctly calculated, but confusion arises when determining the final velocity of the ball after the collision. It is clarified that while the wall's mass is significant, its velocity is effectively zero, leading to the conclusion that the ball should rebound with a velocity of -10 m/s. The conversation emphasizes the need to apply both momentum and energy conservation equations to accurately solve for the velocities involved. Ultimately, the importance of clearly stating equations and understanding the principles of elastic collisions is highlighted.
DarkFalz
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Hello,

i have the following questions. Let's assume that i throw a ball with mass 1kg and velocity 10 m/s at a wall with mass 100000000000000000 and velocity 0

using linear momentum i have in the beginning i have p = 1*10+ 100000000000000*0 = 10

after the impact the wall stays still and so the ball should go back with the same speed but the opposite direction, so i should have

Vf = - Vi

but if i do the calculations:

10 = 1*vf + 100000000000000*0 <=> 10 = vf <=> vf = 10

what have i done wrong? the speed should be -10
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The velocity of the wall after collision is not exactly zero. Even with a small velocity, the product of the mass and the velocity is not negligible.

You should solve it this way:

m: mass of the ball
M: mass of the wall
v0: the velocity of the ball before collision
v: the velocity of the ball after collision
V: the velocity of the wall after collision


mv_{0}=mv+MV


This equation is true for both elastic and inelastic collisions but it has two unknowns. We need another equation to find the velocities. That is the conservation of energy. For an elastic collision, the kinetic energy is conserved:

\frac{1}{2}mv_{0}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}+\frac{1}{2}MV^{2}

from the two equations, you obtain

v=\frac{m-M}{m+M}v_{0}

and

V=\frac{2m}{m+M}v_{0}
 
Last edited:
You need to clarify the question, in particular the line after "but if i do the calculations:" is not clear. Try writing the equation you're using in its general form (using letters) then in the line directly under it, repeat the equation with the specific numbers filled in, and use units.

It looks like what you're trying to say is,
initial momentum of the ball = negative the final momentum of the ball (the wall is irrelevant since it's always multiplied by zero)
pf=-pi
mfvf=-mivi
1 kg x vf=-1 kg x 10 m/s
So vf=-10 m/s.
Now, what's the question?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top