Calculating Velocity of Wreckage After Collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chica1975
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of wreckage after a perfectly inelastic collision between two cars of different masses and speeds. Participants emphasize the importance of using conservation of momentum to determine the combined velocity post-collision. One user expresses difficulty in applying the conservation of momentum correctly, while another clarifies that only momentum conservation is necessary, not energy conservation. The correct approach involves setting up two equations: one for momentum and another reflecting the inelastic nature of the collision. The conversation highlights the need for a solid understanding of these principles to solve collision problems effectively.
Chica1975
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car of mass 950kg traveling at 60km/h in an easterly direction collided perfectly inelastically with another care of mass 1250kg traveling at 55.0km/h in a northerly direction. The design of the smaller care incorporated safety features which ensured that any occupants came to rest relative to the care in a tie of 250m/s. Both vehicles had one occupant of 75.0kg

calculate the velocity of the wreckage immediately after the collision.

Use conservation of momentum to determine the change in momentum of both vehicles



Homework Equations


m1v1 + m2v2 = m'1v'1 + m'2 v'2
I am not sure if the kinetic energy equation fits here too?
.5 m1 v1 E2 + .5 m2 v2 E2 = .5 m1 v'1E2 + .5 m2v'2E2
r= square root (xE2 +yE2)
p=mv

The Attempt at a Solution



I converted all the km/h to m/s
I calculated the momentum of each vehicle p=mv (I also included the weight of the driver for each). Using the answers I found the resultant.
I then rearranged the equation to find v and got the right answer in it.

I am now really struggling with the conservation of momentum - these always get me out. I can't seem to use the right equation and am just blank.

Can someone let me know = thank you. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Chica1975! :smile:
Chica1975 said:
I am now really struggling with the conservation of momentum - these always get me out. I can't seem to use the right equation and am just blank.

As I said in the other thread …
tiny-tim said:
You always need two equations to solve a collision question … one is always conservation of momentum, the other is either conservation of energy or some other constraint like "perfeclty inelastic" or " coefficient of restitution = 0.5".

In this case, your second equation (which you did use) is vf1 = vf2

you don't need, and mustn't use, conservation of energy! :wink:

(But you always need conservation of momentum)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top