Calculating Viscosity of Newtonian Fluid

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics_forums
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Viscosity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the viscosity of a Newtonian fluid using a shearing force applied to a rectangular plate. The initial calculation yielded a viscosity of 0.0000983 CeniPoise, which seemed too low. After a review, it was determined that a decimal error occurred during unit conversion, leading to a corrected viscosity of 0.893 CeniPoise. This value is close to that of water, suggesting the fluid in question is likely water. The conversation highlights the importance of unit accuracy in viscosity calculations.
physics_forums
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A shearing force of 100 dynes is applied to the side of a rectangular plate of 5 x 10 cm dimensions placed on top of a 0.5 mm high column of Newtonian fluid that is initially at rest. As a result of the shearing force, the plate moves at a speed of 11.2 cm/sec. What is the viscosity of this Newtonian fluid? (5 pts)
PS: Can you guess what this fluid is?



Homework Equations



Viscosity = (Force/Area)/(Velocity/Length)

The Attempt at a Solution



Force = 100 dynes
Area= 50 cm^2
Velocity= 11.2 cm/sec
Length= .05 cm

Viscosity = (100/50)/(11.2/.05)
=(2)/(224)
=.00893 Poise
=.0000983 CeniPoise


Can someone double check my work and see if I am on the right track? I am positive I have the right inputs and the right equation, but I have a feeling I am messing up on the units because the answer seems way too low. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you moved your decimal place the wrong way when you converted to cP.
 
Yes, yes I did. So then the viscosity would be .893, so would that make the Newtonian fluid be water? Water is at 1 Centipose and that's the closest thing to my answer. Thanks for the look out Nick :smile:
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top