Calculating Volume of Earth Removed in Open-Pit Coal Mine

  • Thread starter Thread starter lgen0290
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the volume of earth removed in an open-pit coal mine that covers 80 hectares and reaches a depth of 26 meters, the conversion from hectares to square kilometers is crucial. Each hectare equals 0.01 square kilometers, so 80 hectares is 0.8 square kilometers. The volume can be calculated by multiplying the area in square kilometers (0.8) by the depth in kilometers (0.026), resulting in a volume of 0.0208 cubic kilometers. However, there were errors in the initial calculations regarding the area conversion and depth measurement. Accurate conversions and calculations are essential for determining the correct volume of earth removed.
lgen0290
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




A unit of area, often used in measuring land areas, is the "hectare", defined as 104 m2. An open-pit coal mine consumes 80 hectares of land, down to a depth of 26 m, each year. What volume of earth, in cubic kilometers, is removed in this time?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the area to be a square, with each side being .8944(sqrt of 800,000 divided by 1000). I multiplied this by .026. It gave me .0232. Ths answer is not correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heres a hint:

I would start by figuring out how many kilometers squared there are per hectare, and then multiplying by 80. If you know that then you already have the top area converted to km. You seem like you know what you should do from there.
 
OK, there is .1km squared per hectacre. I multiplied by 80, then by .026. I got .208, which is not correct.
 
Your conversion from hectares to km^2 is incorrect. To figure out what is correct start with the equation 1,000,000 m^2 = 1 km^2. Then convert the 1 million m^2 to hectares, and then solve for how many km^2 are in one hectare.
 
lgen0290 said:
OK, there is .1km squared per hectacre.

this is not correct
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top