Calculating Water Splash Depth of Wooden Ball

  • Thread starter Thread starter shak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Depth Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the splash depth of a wooden ball dropped into water, considering its diameter of 5 cm and weight of 40 grams from a height of 1 meter. Participants suggest using conservation of energy principles to relate kinetic and potential energy, but acknowledge the complexity introduced by drag and turbulent flow. A request for a simplified formula is made, with one user providing links to resources that may offer approximations. The conversation highlights the challenges of accurately determining the ball's displacement due to the involved physics. Overall, the participants seek a clearer method to calculate the depth the ball reaches after the initial splash.
shak
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I have a problem.

Say I have a wooden ball, 5 cm in diameter, 40 grams, I drop it from a height of 1 meter into some still water. Obviously, it will splash in and dip a little before buoyancy forces take over and bring it to the surface,

I have never heard of a way, but maybe the pros here know a formula or something,

Is their any way to calculate how deep it will go after the initial splash before the buoyancy forces take over??

Cheers!
Shak
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you could consider a simplified verson using conservation of energy. The kinetic energy of the ball before it impacts the water plus the change in gravitational potential energy, must equal the work done against the buoyancy force.

~H
 
There is also the complication of the huge drag factor while the ball moves through the water, and the flow will probably be turbulent.

Also the impact at the surface of the water will involve a combination of displacement and drag.
 
Thanks guys!

I tried using the energy converting from potential into work done, but the figure comes out obviously wrong...I think you're right about the drag and other factors which are hard to account for...

is their a single complete formula for working this out? or could someone please post a quick and dirty formula which may work?
 
Last edited:
wow! This is getting way over my head, I was expecting something simple like f=ma... :(

I also found this - http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~phys111/Lab/expt02.pdf (Its a PDF!)

Any chance someone who knows the high level maths of double differentials and cosh functions could solve this for the displacement?

As I have said, the ball, of mass m and diameter r, dropped from rest at a height h, top of water can be at h=0,...I guess at the deepest dip point (h=d), the vertical velocity will be 0 (?) sort of like a vertical pendulum experiment we did in school with a spring and weight at the end...

Anyone?!

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top