Calculating watts per square foot

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bacat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Per Square Watts
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the impact of air conditioning on outdoor temperatures in a metropolitan area, specifically translating outdoor temperature into watts per square foot. Participants explore how to estimate the heat dumped by air conditioners and the temperature rise as a function of watts per square foot, with a focus on the heat capacity of air, particularly humid air.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to translate outdoor temperature into watts per square foot and questions the need for heat capacity of air.
  • Another participant argues that watts (power) and temperature (energy) cannot be directly mixed and emphasizes the need for specific heat and assumptions about air volume and movement.
  • A later reply highlights the importance of calculating the heat capacity of humid air, indicating it as a critical point.
  • Another participant suggests that air doesn't contain much moisture, implying that the heat capacity of humid air may not be necessary for the calculations.
  • One participant provides a specific value for a mix of units related to heat capacity but notes the absence of square feet in that context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of considering humid air in calculations, with some arguing it is critical while others suggest it may not be relevant. There is no consensus on how to approach the calculations or the assumptions required.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions that could significantly impact the results, including air movement and the specific heat of air. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the appropriate units and the relevance of humidity in the calculations.

Bacat
Messages
149
Reaction score
1
I am working on a project to consider how much air conditioning in a metropolitan area raises the temperature outside. I am trying to figure out how to translate the temperature outdoors (say 32 degrees C) into watts per square foot.

Once I have the watts per square foot of heat already in the air, I plan to estimate the amount of heat dumped by an air-conditioner with a Coefficient of Performance of 3. Then I want to see how many watts per square foot are being dumped into the air by houses. So I will want to calculate the amount of temperature rise as a function of watts per square foot.

Do I need to use the heat capacity of air?

*EDIT

How would I calculate the heat capacity of moist/humid air?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Watts is a unit of power, whereas temperature is a measure of energy. They can't be mixed in the way you are trying to mix them.

All you really want is the heat capacity of the outdoor air (specific heat), some assumption about the volume of the air (and it's movement...) and the heat flow rate of the energy in buildings to the outside. That's a lot of assumptions that have a big impact on your answer. But you don't need to know the starting energy of the air in any other units but temperature.

For the specific heat of air, I would use 1000 j/kg-k (you can google that).

The big problem you will find with this is that air doesn't stay still. When heated during the day, bubbles of air over cities (and other warm land features) rise and cause convection.
 
Thanks for your response.

Joules per square foot would be fine. But this still doesn't help me calculate the heat capacity of humid air, which is a critical point in the matter.
 
Air doesn't contain much moisture, so no need to bother with that. In a weird, but perhaps useful mix of units, it's .322 watt-hours/Cu Ft-F

No square feet here...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
28K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K